User talk:Miss.Dina Rae

Welcome!

Hello, Miss.Dina Rae, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 00:41, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Music of the Sun, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:41, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to I Care 4 U, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:06, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dina Rae

You asked for a confirmation of your page. It's currently not submitted for a review; you can submit it by adding {{subst:submit}} to the very top. However, it doesn't cite any reliable sources. Without such sources we cannot accept the submission. See also our notability guideline. If you are yourself Dina Rae, you may also want to have a look at our guideline on conflicts of interest; writing an autobiography is strongly discouraged. Huon (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to London with the Lights On, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:58, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up

I reverted the edit because it broke WP:CONSISTENCY by not staying consistent as the producer and label parameters had commas separating them. I'd have no problem with it if the producer and label parameters were changed to a bullet list as well. — Diva Knockouts 16:18, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ciara (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Worth tha Weight, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Genre change warning

Sorry about the incorrect warning about genre changes. As you noted on my talk page, all you did was format another editor's changes. Ruby Murray 15:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked you indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts per the findings of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Miss.Dina Rae. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:28, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dina Rae concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dina Rae, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dina Rae

Hello Miss.Dina Rae. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Dina Rae".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dina Rae}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]