User talk:Miriam Kennet

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. CockpitJim (talk) 12:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is stupid

The current website has been changed to one that is out of date

The books have been changed to a list which is out of date-

what ever for- this is daft-

please revert back to the corrected version

I know which website is live- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miriam Kennet (talk • contribs) 13:50, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If there in information on the pages that is incorrect and you can provide reliable, independent sources to show this, then you are welcome to use the talk page to suggest changes to be made. But as well as having a clear conflict of interest, the edits you made added content that was promotionally worded, unsourced, and copied directly from other websites. None of these kinds of edits are accepted here. Melcous (talk) 07:41, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest and paid editing guidelines

Hello, Miriam Kennet. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 12:54, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Green Economics Institute

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Green Economics Institute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SWL36 (talk) 20:59, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]