User talk:Miracleboywork

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure

Please read and follow as applicable. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:44, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nutraceuticals in tendinopathy

The article Nutraceuticals in tendinopathy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub about one study that may be promotional. WP:TNT. If there is an article to be made about this subject (which seems doubtful), this won't get us there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 09:05, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

REQUEST FOR UNBLOCK

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Miracleboywork (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Friends. I am requesting for unblock. I accept that in past I have made some distructive changes based on some evidences. But now I assure that I will follow all the rules of Wikipedia and will help to build the wikipedia by adding relevant sources information. Waiting for generous response. Thanking you Miracleboywork (talk) 09:26, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As the block is for block evasion, you would either need to explain why that was wrong and that you are not evading a block, or make your unblock request on your original account. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:53, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Miracleboywork (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18266 was submitted on May 12, 2017 09:37:39. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock

Materialscientist ERROR: Please enter the username parameter when using the {{Talkback}} template - thus {{Talkback|<username>}}.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Miracleboywork (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23009 was submitted on Oct 22, 2018 08:54:34. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to request unblock, you need to address the actual reason for the block, which is block evasion. That means you either need to request unblock from your original account, or make a convincing argument that this account is your original and that you were not evading a block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]