User talk:Mipadi/Archive04

You have reached one of Mipadi's archived Talk pages. This archive covers discussion from April 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006. You may also view Mipadi's main Talk page.

Clone Wars

Clone Wars page is looking real good. I can't wait for that to be finished so we can do all those merges :). I bet that once the clone wars edit is finished, activity will increase threefold as people are inspired to fix other things up. — Deckill e r 21:20, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks—I'm hoping I can get it finished soon, but damn, there's a lot of material on that page! – Mipadi 05:38, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jabba the Hutt

Thanks for the encouragement. I just hope no one gets upset because he's not dealt with as a "real" person. Dmoon1 17:55, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'->'

I am very sorry my edit screwed up that info box and I will look out for that next time. I am going to talk to the AWB coders to see if they can take your concerns and address them. (Also, I'm not a bot =) )--mboverload 18:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Computer science

Hi! Just noticed that you have signed on as a participant in WikiProject Computer science, and wanted to welcome you to the project. --Allan McInnes (talk) 17:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! I hope I can be of some service to the project. – Mipadi 17:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "The Lizzie McGuire Movie"

You're probably right, and if it was just that I would probably have let it go with a {{fact}} tag. But it was also poorly written, and I had no idea how to clean it up. I welcome any attempts, though, especially if we can find a source for that information. Powers 12:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clone wars

I like it. But here's what I'm worried about; I'm afraid that this style of article may force us to leave up those one paragraph battle articles that many of us hate. But then again, we have to start applying that out of universe perspective like what you did to Clone Wars, so it's a hard balance. I'd say we expand the summary a bit so we can merge some of thoseone paragraph battle articles, but that's just me. We should probably just save those merges to their respective books and all. — Deckill e r 20:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should just redirect those one-paragraph battle articles to the relevant video game, book, or other material, and provide a description there. In my opinion, that's the optimal way of handling it. I don't know how well that'd go over, though. – Mipadi 01:19, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's also what I've been trying to push for, but I think my brief hiatus really screwed up my chances of getting everyone to understand the reasoning behind plot summary merging :). Oh well, we'll just have to handle the star wars issues bit by bit. — Deckill e r 08:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bash.org Talk

thanks for the explaination and fix. Blaxthos 04:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]