User talk:Minpingjing

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to New Age Orientalism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: New Age Orientalism was changed by Minpingjing (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870409 on 2018-08-13T02:08:00+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing indefinitely for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlock reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Minpingjing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear administrator，I'm not using Wikipedia for spam or advertising, I'm a wikipedia loyal user, I usually use wikipedia to search much Knowledge and find it very good for me , I hear from my friends about ccell , but there is noting in wikipedia, And I know ccell is popular in US cartridges. and this is a brand for revolution ceramic heating elements with Patent certification . and i search several website ,the company website ,and a local US website leafly. so I just want to let otehrs to know. Minpingjing (talk) 08:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you want to do is still considered advertising, which will not be allowed. Please read WP:PROMO. Until you tell what it is you want to edit about other than Ccell and how you will edit differently in the future, you can't be unblocked at this time. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unlock reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Minpingjing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

okay , i just to want to let you why i write about ccell, off course , I have know a lot of others that have nothing in wikipedia, such as haurigor, xrm , and others , so i also want to write others. Minpingjing (talk) 09:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You forgot to tell us "how you will edit differently in the future". Your existing edit was totally inappropriate and we need to be sure you understand why. Yamla (talk) 11:27, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Minpingjing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

yes , thanks for your suggestion , I have already clearly read the policy again, I admit to follow wikipedia community customs and do not write anything going against the policy. when i write again, and i will just write wikipedia that allows.Minpingjing (talk) 01:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The trouble with unblock requests that just say vague things such as that the blocked editor will just edit in ways that are acceptable, is that experience over the years shows that in such cases almost always the editor does not, in fact, understand what the problems are, and so he or she will in fact make the same mistakes again. You need to actually tell us what you think about your past editing was unacceptable, and in what ways your future editing will be different. It is not enough to just tell us that you won't do the same again, without telling us what yo won't do again. (Note: There was more than one thing about your first edit that was totally unacceptable.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:57, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.