User talk:Miniapolis/Archives/2021/July
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
To lead or not to lead
[edit]M: I'm happy to be lead coordinator unless you want to do it for a while. I mainly wanted to make it clear that I do not feel ownership of the position, despite having sat in the chair for many terms, and that if someone else has the desire, I am happy to step aside. I am open to your thoughts. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:21, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- I only offered to lead because I inferred that you wanted to take a break, so it's all yours; I'm happy to remain a coordinator. Thanks for asking and all the best, Miniapolis 17:06, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
- Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
- An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.
- IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.
- The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.
Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
[edit]Hello Miniapolis/Archives/2021:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1200 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
IRC
[edit]Confirming that user/Miniapolis is me on Libera. Miniapolis 15:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my RFA
[edit]Here's hoping I don't misuse the tools. I'll confess yesterday I drove the bus right up to the edge of the crater, clicked on "edit this page" on the mainpage, and sure enough, if I'd been a troublemaker could have deleted the page and run off. But I'm just the boring fellow who will step back from the abyss and spit. Thanks so much for your support. Please call on me. BusterD (talk) 21:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Parwan Detention Facility copyvio
[edit]I just noticed that you added a copyvio tag to the article Parwan Detention Facility and noticed that much of it was copy pasted from https://web.archive.org/web/20150324191653/https://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/world/asia/parwan-prison-at-bagram-transferred-to-afghans-at-least-formally.html. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-19544118 https://web.archive.org/web/20190403165300/https://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/06/world/asia/us-will-hold-part-of-afghan-prison-after-handover.html and possibly other sources Thepharoah17 (talk) 17:13, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Someone else tagged the section as a possible copyvio, not me; I listed the tag as a reason for declining a copyedit on the article talk page. Thanks for the sources; I'll check them and do what I can to clean up any copyvio found. All the best, Miniapolis 17:22, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- I see that those sources are Earwig's top three results; however, the text in question seems to be cited with other RS (such as other BBC stories). Since I'm not knowledgeable enough about copyvio to confidently remove the tag, I'm pinging TheTechnician27 (who placed it in January 2020). Miniapolis 19:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Miniapolis: Thanks for the ping. I actually have very little recollection of this, so I'm going to have to sit down when I have some free time and remember what I meant and to see if the claim of plagiarized material is still relevant in the current revision. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 13:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- I see that those sources are Earwig's top three results; however, the text in question seems to be cited with other RS (such as other BBC stories). Since I'm not knowledgeable enough about copyvio to confidently remove the tag, I'm pinging TheTechnician27 (who placed it in January 2020). Miniapolis 19:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 July 2021
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimania and a million other news stories
- Special report: Hardball in Hong Kong
- In the media: Larry is at it again
- Board of Trustees candidates: See the candidates
- Traffic report: Football, tennis and marveling at Loki
- News from the WMF: Uncapping our growth potential – interview with James Baldwin, Finance and Administration Department
- Humour: A little verse
Discontent Content Issue 6
[edit]Welcome, subscribers, to the sixth Discontent Content newsletter! Discontent Content is a newsletter aiming to collate and improve Wikipedia articles in need of more eyes and hands to get them in shape. Its unique trimodal structure allows editors to work where they feel comfortable -- with stubs and starts needing to be brought to standard, mid-quality articles with Good or Featured potential, or quality-assessed articles needing help to maintain their status. Articles in this category are those that need to be brought up to a minimum quality standard. Some will be stubs; others will be longer articles that nonetheless have significant concerns putting them far below B- or C-class adequacy. This issue's Category 1 articles are:
Articles in this category, while in better current shape than Category 1, are still missing something. They have the potential to be truly high-quality content, and may have been at one point. With work, they can be brought up to dizzying heights. This issue's Category 2 articles are:
Articles in this category have been assessed through a content review process in the past, but may require work to be brought up to current GA/FA standard. Editors can help bring them to a level where the star or plus near their names can once again shine. This issue's Category 3 articles are:
After my prior thoughts on GA sweeps and their viability, work is beginning to break down what parts of the backlog can be tackled. Planning is beginning at User:Vaticidalprophet/GA reform and its talk; feel free to give your opinion, participate in current GARs, and assess articles. The current plan is to look at GAs with outstanding cleanup tags as our first priority. Sorry for the delay this time around -- I've been having A Month healthwise. I expect to maintain this at an approximately monthly schedule and will try not to let it slip further. I'm enthused by the work going on at GAR lately and hope to work something excellent out of it. |