User talk:Minhojo77

Welcome!

Hello, Minhojo77, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Johnuniq (talk) 04:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Your addition to Radio-frequency identification has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Johnuniq (talk) 04:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have again removed the copyright violations from Mobile RFID and Radio-frequency identification. You must not add the material again without explaining on the talk page of each article why the addition is warranted. From your user name, you may feel that you have the right to add the material, but from Wikipedia's point of view that is not satisfactory. Please see WP:C and WP:DCM. Johnuniq (talk) 01:27, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Johnuniq,

I had posted the content along with references numbered automatically by the Wikipedia system.

In addition, the references' author is myself. But they are deleted.

Is it still the copyright problem with my posted contents? Minhojo77 (talk) 08:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind, but I have refactored (altered) your comment to show how it is normally done here (use ':' at left margin for indent, and put signature (four tildes) at end of last line).

We assume that material on a website is copyrighted, and therefore if someone copies a portion of such text and pastes it into a page here, then that is a copyvio (copyright violation). Quite apart from any legal consequences, editors are concerned about "doing the right thing": we prefer not to take material from another source, but if it is acceptable to do so for some reason and we do take the material, we must acknowledge the source.

You may be the author, and yet not own the copyright (it's complex!). Often a research organization or a publisher will retain all rights, and while they may sometimes allow an author to make a copy of their paper available on the author's website, that does not allow the author to put material here (for one thing, material on Wikipedia can be copied by anyone for any purpose, with certain qualifications).

I am not an authority on this sort of thing. For further information, you should start at the two links I mentioned: WP:C and WP:DCM.

A good way to handle this kind of situation is to treat the paper as a reference (assuming that it satisfies WP:IRS): Find some useful information in the paper, and add a rewritten summary to the article (rewritten so that it is not plagiarism). Then, use the paper as a reference. Adding references can be tricky (see WP:CITE) but all you need to do is to put the information in brackets, and someone will fix it later.

It is not good encyclopedic style to put something like the following in an article: "Several solutions are found from the following references...". Either include a summary of the information (but only if it is appropriate for the article), or omit the mention. A possibility (if the link satisfies WP:EL) would be to add the link to the "External links" section. Johnuniq (talk) 10:24, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Johnuniq,

I have re-written the newly introduction parts added by me along with related references.

I would say that the newly added parts are most important basic knowledge for many general readers. Because the important basic parts were missed, I have added them. In addition, there will be no problem with copyright problem. Minhojo77 (talk) 04:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Let's wait and see if any other editors have comments. Any further discussions about the article should be on the article talk page at Talk:Radio-frequency identification. Johnuniq (talk) 05:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]