User talk:Minedigger

Welcome...

Hello, Minedigger, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Libby norman (talk) 23:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Some pages you might like to check out are:

Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia – main welcome page.
Wikipedia:Introduction – Wikipedia introduction page.
Wikipedia:Tutorial – Wikipedia editing tutorial.
Wikipedia:Questions – the "where to ask questions" directory.
Wikipedia:FAQ – quick answers to the most common questions.
Wikipedia:New contributors' help page – a place for new users to post questions and get answers by volunteers who monitor or frequent the page.
Wikipedia:Help desk – where volunteers answer questions on how to use Wikipedia. Many new users go there for help too.
Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User – where a new user can be adopted by an experienced user who will be his/her mentor.
Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual – Thorough and intuitive guide to Wikipedia.

Deletion discussion about Herobrine (Gameknight999)

Hello, Minedigger,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Herobrine (Gameknight999) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herobrine (Gameknight999) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 12:46, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Gameknight999 (character)

Hello, Minedigger,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Gameknight999 (character) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gameknight999 (character) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 12:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crafter (character)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Crafter (character) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:58, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Minedigger, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Minedigger!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:20, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle for the Nether (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Libby norman was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle for the Nether and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Libby norman (talk) 23:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Minedigger, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Libby norman (talk) 23:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Invasion of the Overworld (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Libby norman was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Invasion of the Overworld and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Libby norman (talk) 23:40, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gameknight999 (book series) (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Libby norman was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gameknight999 (book series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Libby norman (talk) 23:41, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Refusals at Afc

Hi Minedigger, sorry but I've just refused some articles of yours – nothing personal but they all have the same issue, which is not enough good references. I just wanted to add a human voice! The thing I didn't know...and wish someone had told me when I wrote my first articles...is that sources have to be external. In other words, you can't reference a book with the company that published the book because that is considered to be linked to the book and so not neutral. A parallel would be that if XYZ says it makes a great car – well, it would say that wouldn't it. If a magazine reviewer who drove it but hasn't been paid to say something nice says it's a great car you may believe it is. Sourcing is crucial and you need more than one good (ie, independent) source. Hope that helps. Best wishes Libby norman (talk) 00:01, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Funny deleted articles

Wikipedia:Funny deleted articles, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Funny deleted articles and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Funny deleted articles during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:38, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Weird stuff that you really should not call articles

Wikipedia:Weird stuff that you really should not call articles, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Weird stuff that you really should not call articles and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Weird stuff that you really should not call articles during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]