User talk:Minecraft902

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:32, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Minecraft902 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have constantly been editing articles wrongly, that is why I was blocked. The reason I wish to be unblocked is that I believe everybody, no matter how devious, cruel, or harsh deserves a second chance.

"Blessed are the poor in spirit, for the kingdom of heaven is theirs."-God

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. If you're going to get a second chance, you'll need to request it from your original account. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:00, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment: Minecraft902 was blocked as a sock of a very prolific serial vandalist, so don't unblock without contacting Barek first. Thomas.W ^talk 15:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Minecraft902 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I really want a clean start with ONE ACCOUNT. I understand what WP:NOT, and I know the rules better. I am a religious person, and therefore believe everybody deserves a second chance.

Decline reason:

You abuse multiple accounts to repeatedly vandalise Wikipedia, and yet you appear to be insinuating that admins are unreasonable for not allowing you to continue to do so. I suggest that if you would like to regain the trust of the community, you take advantage of the standard offer:

Wait six months, without sockpuppetry (if applicable).
Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban.
Don't create any extraordinary reasons to object to a return.

Once complete you can post a new unblock request. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 22:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Per WP:UP#CMT, please note that one of the items that are not to be removed from your talk page are "Declined unblock requests regarding a currently active block". --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:42, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Minecraft902 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I AM NOT ABUSING MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS!!! The last thing that I wanted to happen was me getting blocked. I was blocked for supposedly "abusing multiple accounts" and "vandalism".

Decline reason:

You first admit wrongdoing ("editing articles wrongly"), now deny it ("The last thing that I wanted to happen was me getting blocked", and saying your vandalism was "supposed"). I think you will need to make up your mind which story to go with first. If you're going with the second, you'd also need to come up with a convincing story for how and why you, two different IPs, and a different account, all simultaneously got the idea to perform the exact same type of vandalism on the exact same page. All I can say is: Good luck. - Vianello (Talk) 02:23, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been warned repeatedly not to blank prior declined unblock requests. Also, DO NOT alter text of the block message. Continued disruption will result in your talk page privileges being revoked. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

K, srry I just think it decreases my chance to be unblocked. Minecraft902 (talk) 17:11, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're darned right it does. Which is why the rules say they can't be removed.Thomas.W ^talk 12:13 pm, Today (UTC−5)