User talk:MindscapesGraphicDesign

Welcome!

Hello, MindscapesGraphicDesign, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

meco (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:27, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. I know wikipedia process can be weird, but as creator of the page, you must leave it to others to handle after you make your case. It would be silly otherwise...obviously if you create a page, you intend to have the page exist. DMacks (talk) 05:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Universal Universalism

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Universal Universalism, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 05:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove text which I have placed a great deal of effort into researching and developing, and added to Wikipedia. My interest and intentions with Wikipedia is to improve Wikipedia overall, and not damage it in any way. Also, if there is information which I have added it is not intended to be vandalism or a hoax, and placing that label on it is quite offensive. If I have not followed certain protocol, then I can understand that but to state that aything that I add is a hoax is untrue and an insult. MindscapesGraphicDesign (talk) 02:58, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One more of those and I report you for harassment.

Getting your article deleted doesn't give you free reign to pull a hissy-fit across the site. HalfShadow 03:13, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop dropping the template all over the wiki. Acroterion _(talk) 03:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Acroterion; for your positive feedback, and I will certainly endeavor to become increasingly familiarized with the proper protocol of Wikipedia. MindscapesGraphicDesign (talk) 20:32, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please Follow Proper Wikipedia Protocol!

Please do not remove text which I have placed a great deal of effort into researching and developing, and added to Wikipedia. My interest and intentions with Wikipedia is to improve Wikipedia overall, and not damage it in any way. Also, if there is information which I have added it is not intended to be vandalism or a hoax, and placing that label on it is quite offensive. If I have not followed certain protocol, then I can understand that but to state that aything that I add is a hoax is untrue and an insult. Why are you deleting my entries and not providing a valid reason for such? MindscapesGraphicDesign (talk) 03:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Damian Stone seems to have had more than one career, which casts reasonable doubt on the veracity of the article.; the latest version concerning a dentist makes no indication of notability and was appropriately deleted. The first version was an author of childrens' books that never established notability.Acroterion _(talk) 03:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are repeatedly leaving a template on an editor's talkpage who nominated your inappropriately-placed complaint for deletion: he acted appropriately. You are not. Stop harassing him. Acroterion _(talk) 03:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To quote the previous deletion note: "Blatant hoax: no hits at amazon, google, or worldcat for either isbn; editor has previously created same-named page with entirely different description of person" In light of those finding, deletion is the appropriate measure. Acroterion _(talk) 03:33, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And further, your comments at Talk:1960 are an inappropriate attack on an editor who did the homework before deleting the article. Do not make such comments again. See WP:AUTHOR for notability guidelines for authors. Articles must provide evidence of notability by reference to significant coverage by major third-party media; there is no evidence of such coverage. What little is cited is tangential. I found the just-published Amalgam Nation, bit see no evidence of the author at this point, who seems to be an entirely different person than the first subject. Acroterion _(talk) 03:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, well, how has the deletion of James Spader on born in 1960 and other things which I have edited considered harrasment?

Proposed deletion of File:DamianStoneJanuary1993.jpg

The file File:DamianStoneJanuary1993.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]