User talk:Mindraker

Olive branch

David, I'm really sorry about all this. I know how intelligent that you are, and how much of an asset that you could be to Wikipedia. It's my sincere hope that this is all just some big misunderstanding. Please, if you have any questions, please feel free to ask. You can reply here, and I will keep an eye out for anything that you say. Best wishes, El on ka 23:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Nuts!" -- General Anthony McAuliffe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mindraker (talk • contribs) 20:50, December 17, 2007

Radwan Dąbrowski-Żądło Family

I wonder if this is notable? See talk. Thanks, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 02:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/75.143.208.13 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ^Avruchtalk 21:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Odynorgasmia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Odynorgasmia, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11411663, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Odynorgasmia and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Odynorgasmia, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Odynorgasmia with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Odynorgasmia. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Odynorgasmia saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! —Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 15:32, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Monozyotic listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Monozyotic. Since you had some involvement with the Monozyotic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — the Man in Question (in question) 21:25, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coitus à unda

The article Coitus à unda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not in source, single source. The "á unda" here is just a play on "under"'; User:Eubot in its indwidom has managed to make "Coitus a unda" out of it, thus mixing three languages in three words. It's bollox, it doesn't give any information to readers, just delete it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Si Trew (talk) 16:12, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jyamrung Dada

The article Jyamrung Dada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Under this English transliteration of the name, I can't find any reliable sources to verify that this hill exists, let alone anything about it. It isn't on the Geonet database, and there's nothing reliable anywhere else. There's no indication of what the Nepali name of this hill is, so I can't search in Nepali.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:39, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of U-TDOA

The article U-TDOA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

original research, reads like an advertisement, notability not established, created by blocked sockpuppeteer

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:18, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of U-TDOA

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on U-TDOA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:05, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]