User talk:Minamorcose

electric battery

Sorry for not explaining the (partial) revert better in my edit summary, and thanks for editing in the first place! How did you come across this paper, by the way? IpseCustos (talk) 12:07, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i found it on google Mina Farage (talk) 12:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I assume the reason Google ranks the paper so highly is precisely that its author abused Wikipedia to advertise it (though, in your case, the typo in "relation" might also have been a factor).

If you fix the typo, you're likely to get a number of suitable sources. IpseCustos (talk) 12:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please Clarify to me Why Google shouldn't rank it higher ( i am not affiliated with them i just carious ) Please forgave me i am inexperienced Mina Farage (talk) 12:24, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to apologize (for you; apology on my part in the next paragraph). My assumption is that Google hasn't updated their rankings after Wikipedia removed the refspam links.

I'm sorry I didn't assume good faith when I saw your edit. I should have, and I understand you're annoyed that it might look like you violated WP policy when someone else did and you did not do anything wrong. That said, I would still have removed this specific reference, just with a different edit summary.

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, by the way, and I hope you stay with the project! IpseCustos (talk) 12:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it's OK i am not annoyed i was just couldn't understand why this source considered spam seemed legit to me it appears there is past here Mina Farage (talk) 12:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this my search link https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&client=firefox-b-d&q=battery+chemistry+voltage+releation+edu&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj2m9egzc34AhVD3RoKHVHDB6AQ7xYoAHoECAEQMQ&biw=1366&bih=615&dpr=1 Mina Farage (talk) 12:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]