User talk:Min01f
February 2024
[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Sion Sono, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 13:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- The content defames Sion Sono’s reputation because it is not true. The only truth is this part: Sono Sion and Shuukan Josei reached a settlement on February 1, 2024, in which Shuukan Josei agreed to delete two articles from April 2022 that originally made the allegations. Since Shuukan Josei agreed to delete the articles, you should not write the same contents in Wikipedia. Thank you for your understanding. Min01f (talk) 15:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- The article makes no judgement as to whether the allegations are true or not. But the events described (and sourced) still happened and are therefore true. If you think the way they are described in inaccurate, or not adequately balanced, then please suggest how they might be better described. But please don't just blank them as if they never occurred. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 13:45, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- I would suggest the following:
- Delete here
- On April 5, in a video he posted on YouTube, actor Tak Sakaguchi, who has appeared in Sono's films, identified himself as the actor merely identified as "T" in the Shūkan Josei article, and confirmed he organized the drinking party that led to Sono allegedly assaulting one of the accusing actresses.[52]
- reason
- This is the matter of Tak Sakaguchi. So, it shouldn’t written in Sion Sono’s page.
- Also the Shukan Josei article was deleted under the decision of the court, the content should not be written here.
- Delete here
- On April 6, Shūkan Bunshun reported that producer Haruo Umekawa, who produced Sono's Love Exposure and Himizu, has allegedly pressured actresses for sexual favors in exchange for being cast in his films.[53]
- reason
- Since this is the matter of Haruo Umekawa, it shouldn’t be written in this section.
- He is a producer of Love Exoposure and Himizu. That’s it.
- Delete here
- In a statement released on April 13, 2022, actress Kiko Mizuhara said she had heard widespread rumors about Sono's sexual conduct and had been warned by a fellow actor when she was offered a role in his film.[54]
- reason
- This is the rumor that Kiko Mizuhara heard and the gossip magazine pick it up.
- It should not be included here. This reference is unreasonable and malicious.
- If you accept this suggestion, I'll make this fix. Min01f (talk) 16:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- No one responded to my suggestions. Therefore I make this modification.
- If you object to my correction, please discuss it with me and seek consensus before undoing. Min01f (talk) 05:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- The article makes no judgement as to whether the allegations are true or not. But the events described (and sourced) still happened and are therefore true. If you think the way they are described in inaccurate, or not adequately balanced, then please suggest how they might be better described. But please don't just blank them as if they never occurred. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 13:45, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sion Sono, you may be blocked from editing. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 13:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- I made suggestions in replies to the editor and on the article's talk page, but received no objections. Therefore I made a modification. If you disagree with my corrections, please discuss with me and seek consensus before undoing. Min01f (talk) 05:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please don't blank content without first getting a third opinion, removing the allegations compromises the article's neutrality. I will self-revert. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 16:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sion Sono, you may be blocked from editing. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 16:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Min01f! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for all the information.
- I want to deepen my understanding of wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
- Many thanks. Min01f (talk) 08:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)