User talk:Mimag343

Welcome!

Hello, Image ias, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Image ias/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Image ias/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Image ias/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Image ias/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Image ias, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia; and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mimag343 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18202 was submitted on May 04, 2017 22:54:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:54, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mimag343 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I prepared in good faith an article about non-profit journal Image Analysis & Stereology, as are many other articles on Wiki, such as: [1] Why would a small group of non-profit volunteers be blocked when mentioning our scientific journal with 30 years of tradition. There are hundreds of scientific journals presented on Wikipedia: [2] It is disappointing that my article is speedy deleted and I am blocked from editing Wikipedia. Springer is a multinational profit oriented company and they are allowed to have their journals presented on Wikipedia. It seems an obvious error that we were blocked when trying to do the same. Image ias (talk) 07:14, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Far from indicating that you understand the reason for the block and will not make the same mistake again, your unblock request makes it clear that you do not understand or do not accept the reason for the block, and that you fully intend to continue to do the same. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mimag343 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

mimag343 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand that Image_ias may have been perceived as promotional username. Although Image is a general term. The abbreviation IAS may indeed be linked to Image Analysis and Stereology or many other [3]

Decline reason:

See above. Please do not have two unblock requests open at the same time. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

thanks. Dloh cierekim 07:34, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the instructions for renaming could be clearer.

I think you click -> Special:GlobalRenameRequest Dloh cierekim 07:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mimag343. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declaration regarding conflicts of interest

I have added the declaration to the talk page: The editor Mimag343 has no conflict of interest. It does not involve contribution of friends, clients, employers, or has any financial relationships. The only relationship to declare is, that the editor does pro-bono volunteer work connected to the Wikipedia contribution. Mimag343 (talk) 10:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Image Analysis & Stereology has been accepted

Image Analysis & Stereology, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also WP:JWG for tips on how to improve journal articles, but it seems likely that you have already followed it. One thing though, that image is likely not your own work, and will likely get deleted from Wikimedia commons. WP:JWG#Cover has some details on how to do this properly, but I'll give you a hand if you run into issues.Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well done and welcome aboard. Dloh cierekim 13:25, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis

Hello Mimag343,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains (talk) 21:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis

Hello Mimag343, as stated directly above, the article concerning the International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis did not indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. Articles must demonstrate notability beyond primary sources I am happy to restore the article and move it into your personal draft space so you are able to work on it further if that's your choice to do so. -- Longhair\^talk 12:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your restored article is now available at Draft:International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis. Please let me know if you require any further assistance. Happy editing. -- Longhair\^talk 13:02, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis

Hello Mimag343,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains (talk) 18:51, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]