User talk:Millergonomics

Welcome!

Hello, Millergonomics, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sleep inertia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

and alertness | journal = Journal of Sleep Research | volume = 8 | issue = 1 | pages = 1–8 }}</ref> Morning sleep inertia actually takes two to four hours to dissipate completely, though we

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:24, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 346th Tactical Airlift Squadron may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

At Dyess, the squadron was part of the 516th Tactical Airlift Wing of [[Tactical Air Command]] (later, the squadron became the [[516th Aeronautical Systems Wing]]. <ref>Miller JC. Pilot, 346th

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

346th Tactical Airlift Squadron

I'm again removing the material you once again added to the 346th Tactical Airlift Squadron because it is not cited to a reliable source as defined by Wikipedia. The additions do not meet the criteria of Wikipedia. I do not doubt that the additions are accurate, but unless they have been published, they constitute original research.

I've included links above so you can become more familiar in this area. If you come across published material that supports these additions (as you did in your addition concerning the tempo of operations), feel free to add them back. They'd be a welcome expansion of the squadron's SEA operations. In the meanwhile, they're still on the article's talk page where they can be discussed. --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

We at Wikipedia love evidence based medicine. You must therefore cited the best available evidence aswell as write in a consistent format. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harvard Fatigue Laboratory (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 09:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Millergonomics, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 09:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]