User talk:MilkYouInBucket

March 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Aphthous stomatitis have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Aphthous stomatitis was changed by MilkYouInBucket (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877765 on 2022-03-10T23:59:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:59, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MilkYouInBucket (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An edit conflict is not appropriate. It should be User:Nick Moyes's fault for edit conflict. The block was inconvinent. I apologize. Diff link: here

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MilkYouInBucket (talk) 00:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is the block length? --MilkYouInBucket (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The block is indefinite. casualdejekyll 00:33, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Casualdejekyll: No way! If you are real, please consult with the blocking admin (access this page first, then open the blocking admin's talk page). Thank you. --MilkYouInBucket (talk) 00:37, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:DENY I refuse to engage further. casualdejekyll 00:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how it's her responsibility to talk to the blocking admin about your block. By the way, the log shows you were blocked for evasion, not some edit conflict. Other than that, seconding the above message about WP:DENY. Have a great day. — {{u|Bsoyka}} ^talk 00:40, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bsoyka: Who blocked me? --MilkYouInBucket (talk) 00:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Special:BlockList/MilkYouInBucket. — {{u|Bsoyka}} ^talk 00:43, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bsoyka: Clarfiy, and type in their username here. I don't wanna see it. --MilkYouInBucket (talk) 00:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Goodbye. — {{u|Bsoyka}} ^talk 00:46, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Breast999A per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Breast999A. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:52, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]