User talk:Milfsandminors

Your submission at Articles for creation: 3 naan (July 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Milfsandminors! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 01:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.

Cullen328 (talk) 02:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Milfsandminors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

cypherlink (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

The username was not intented to harm someone's feelings, it was clearly a misunderstanding, i strongly condemn the previous username and i have proposed a new username which seems appropriate to wiki guidlines C Y P H E Rlink 09:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Cypherlink is a software package. Usernames may not represent a group, organisation, or business, a role within them, a product, a service, or a website. Your real name is not required, just something unique to you that represents YOU, not your job. Please read the username policy and choose another name. Cabayi (talk) 14:59, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature did not work inside the template, I had to strip it back to the basics in order to respond. Cabayi (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Milfsandminors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

'logicallyAmeer' (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

'this seems right C Y P H E R

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, you are going to need a much more direct explanation why you picked a pro-pedophile username and esposed underage sex on your (now deleted) user page. Combined with garbage like Draft:3_naan, you are going to need to try much, much harder to convince us it would be in the project's best interests to unblock you. Yamla (talk) 20:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Milfsandminors

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:Milfsandminors, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:01, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Milfsandminors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

LogicallyAmeer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

the main reason to request unblock is that the previous username did not comply with wikipedia's guidlines and i accept that.I was not sure or maybe it was my fault that i did not saw the username policies of wikipedia.I have made different edits to wiki they are not much but i was trying.If could lift up my block i can continue editing and be a useful asset to the project.

Decline reason:

This isn't a simple mistake. Either you are ignorant about what your current username represents, or you are being deliberately evasive with our questions. Either possiblity is not good for this project. I am declining your request and removing talk page access, this leaves you with WP:UTRS for further appeals, though they will need to address our questions much better. 331dot (talk) 07:58, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This does not address your choice of a pro-pedophile username and does not address you esposing underage sex and does not address Draft:3 naan. Are you absolutely sure you want to risk losing talk page access with the above unblock request? --Yamla (talk) 12:02, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

as i said the username was just a mistake and i do not promote pedophilia and espose underage sex.About draft:3 naan it was a internet trend just like binod (meme) which was recognised by different well-known brands.I want a new username to start over and leave this one to comply with the guidlines C Y P H E R | link 12:12, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:3 naan

Hello, Milfsandminors. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:3 naan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]