User talk:Miladkian

December 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 17:52, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Miladkian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I create a page for famous man in Iran with many references. Why should i blocked? please review my article. its not promotion because it has many references. please search about this person. i do not believe this!!! Miladkian (talk) 18:00, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think I'm getting the whole story from you(based on your experienced edits that don't match being a new user), and I'm not convinced that you just chatted with Mr. Khosravi about a potential English Wikipedia article about him. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:16, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your connection to Arash Eyvazi? 331dot (talk) 19:27, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know it from Sirvan Khosravi concert and i am his fan. He is very famous Iranian bassist and i decide to create his page because i follow his works. i contact with him in Instagram and ask him about create page. Miladkian (talk) 19:31, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He is the artists of two big compony in US and i reference it! Miladkian (talk) 19:33, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As the blocking administrator, I find it extremely difficult to believe that you weren't creating this page for the exclusive benefit of Mr Khosravi. MER-C 11:16, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arash play for many other singer like Xaniar Khosravi, Hamed Homayon, Naser Cheshmazar and ... . where is my fault? I am not fan of Mr Khosravi and just create page for Arash Eyvazi because he is the only Iranian artist that play for two big US company. I am not spamer and if you check my article you can find that i am a programmer and good skill in Wikipedia. I just start my working on Wikipedia with create an article that i know about it. Just this! Please let me know which part of my work is wrong? i am able and want to correct my work. Please let me edit page to prove my work instead blocking me! Miladkian (talk) 12:09, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reference for my article. to proving my reason please read this article about Arash. http://taranehsh.com/tsh/team/arash-eyvazi/ Taraneh Sharghi (Persian Name) is one of the biggest music company at Iran. Is it spam? this content is exactly what i reference in my article. please read this link to believe that i do not create this page to promoting person. I search about Arash and find this biography and create the article base of this. why i should be blocked? i do not understand.Please please please can you ask Iranian or Persian administrator to confirm my article??? Miladkian (talk) 21:24, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to your email, You are not blocked "forever", you are blocked until you make a successful unblock request. We cannot help you with issues on the Persian Wikipedia, and their administrators do not necessarily have admin powers here. That is a separate project. 331dot (talk) 18:30, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. can you please read my article and my reason and tell me what is my fault? I completely describe my connection with Arash as you asked. If i do something wrong, please tell me and please let me to correct it. I asked some Iranian administrator to review my article. thanks. Miladkian (talk) 18:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No legitimate new editor cares about this: [1][2][3]. MER-C 19:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am a software developer. I care about this. you can check my linkdin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kianmehr. I am a new user but different form other new user because i am a developer. I read all documents about writing article and find that new articles dose not index in google about 30 days. it's not good reason to decline my request because i have no other email address and never ever sign up in Wikipedia. Why you don't let me edit my work and have a chance to prove my work. Do you believe that i cant help Wikipedia with this skills? Blocking me does not solve the problem. You remove me forever form Wikipedia and i am very sad when know this.Miladkian (talk) 08:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can block me again when ever you want. If you believe that i am doing wrong so i accept and i ask you to tell me how can i correct my work. So please give me a chance. If i do something wrong again block me forever. I trust my self that i am not spammer. thank you for your review.Miladkian (talk) 08:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to make another unblock request. 331dot (talk) 08:41, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C, 331dot, and TParis: you blocked me forever and nobody review my request. I am not fake. I am here to work! please review your decision again.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Miladkian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a software developer. I care about this. you can check my linkdin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kianmehr. I am a new user but different form other new user because i am a developer. I read all documents about writing article and find that new articles dose not index in google about 30 days. it's not good reason to decline my request because i have no other email address and never ever sign up in Wikipedia. Why you don't let me edit my work and have a chance to prove my work. Do you believe that i cant help Wikipedia with this skills? Blocking me does not solve the problem. You remove me forever form Wikipedia and i am very sad when know this. You can block me again when ever you want. If you believe that i am doing wrong so i accept and i ask you to tell me how can i correct my work. So please give me a chance. If i do something wrong again block me forever. I trust my self and i am not spammer. Now i understand why i am blocked and wants to correct my work. thank you for your review. Miladkian (talk) 08:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:15, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Miladkian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am blocked forever and i don't know why! could you please review my account and tell me why it's blocked? I write an article and blocked forever because some one tell me you try to index your article. is it wrong? please review my article and my refrences. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Arash_Eyvazi. all of this article has a refrnces Miladkian (talk) 07:07, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The reasons for the block are explained at some length above. If you do not understand why you are blocked, we cannot unblock you.Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

why should i blocked forever? can you review the reasons? it's not true!.Miladkian (talk) 07:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Miladkian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can you please review my block reason. I know your concerns and i read the all rules of Wikipedia to avoid repeat this. I have been block for a long time and i am here to work again. Miladkian (talk) 07:40, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Since your access to this talk page has been revoked, please use WP:UTRS. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS 30850

https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30850 is now closed. Response carried over:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. Please describe how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked.
As has been explained many times, you are using Wikipedia for promotional purposes. You give the appearance of being an Undeclared paid editor. You ask, "how can i correct my work?" Please disclose your outside connection with Arash Eyvazi. Please read and heed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Paid-contribution_disclosure and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest.
Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks)
Thank you for your attention to these matters.

--Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 18:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Miladkian: In response to your email. Please request unblock via WP:UTRS, dealing with the reasons for your block. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 05:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS #31001

This user requests unblock on UTRS #31001 . @Yamla, 331dot, Yunshui, NinjaRobotPirate, TParis, and MER-C: you are invited to share your views. If I missed anyone, you're invited too. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 20:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Error 403: This action is unauthorized." I'm not going to mess around with buggy third-party software. I've got better things to do. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry you got the 403. You might need to sign in via UTRS You might receive an email saying all is well. It's a little quirky. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 20:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: You're on the list, so hopefully just a temporary set back. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 20:57, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone not on the list should probably sign in first and wait for an email. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 20:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My decline was procedural only (the unblock request was stale). I would suggest they pick a different topic area to write about and then I'd have no objections. Note, though, that I did not establish (one way or another) if they had indeed engaged in covert advertising. The original blocking admin was MER-C, I revoked TPA. --Yamla (talk) 21:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I don't see anything in the UTRS appeal that would convince me to unblock, but am perfectly happy if someone else feels that it is sufficient. Yunshui ^雲 _水 23:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This review is now closed.

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. I am declining your unblock request because it does not fully address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) Thank you for your attention to these matters.

--Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 17:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arash Eyvazi

Hello, Miladkian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arash Eyvazi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Arash Eyvazi and Fodera.jpg

The file File:Arash Eyvazi and Fodera.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Picture of non-notable person, article about subject (Arash Eyvazi) was deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:12, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]