User talk:Mikeyyking

Mikeyyking, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mikeyyking! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Subway Surfers has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Subway Surfers was changed by Mikeyyking (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950744 on 2013-08-08T16:04:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:04, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm EuroCarGT. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Subway Surfers, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ///EuroCarGT 00:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to User:Mikeystar has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. EWikist (talk) 03:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Subway Surfers. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ///EuroCarGT 03:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Subway Surfers. ///EuroCarGT 03:47, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Subway Surfers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

next World Tour will be taking place in Los Angeles,CA with American Boy band Mindless Behavior (Roc Royal, Princeton(puffed ponytail), Prodigy, and Ray Ray as the limited character.Get Roc Royal

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:46, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Repeatedly adding the same unsourced and promotional material to the article Subway Surfers after having already been blocked for the same. Wikipedia articles should not include price lists or current sales promotions from their topics, and you have not responded to any messages left you with regard to that.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Monty ₈₄₅ 18:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikeyyking (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm deeply sorry for the disturbance of editing without a source. I was just writing something that I thought would be fun and helpful and something for you to consider I didn't know I was hurting the wikipedia like that or vandalizing, I would love to get unblock.I would love to get taught what to do as far as editing and what source can I get the information from that I want to put on the wikipedia and what not to do on the wikipedia pages, I just want my opinion on the next world tour to be seen and be consider. I promise this won't ever happen again. Mikeyyking (talk) 22:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)]][reply]

Decline reason:

We don't add opinions to articles. We add reliably sourced, verifiably made factual claims. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.