User talk:Mikelsey5
Hello, Mikelsey5. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Raymond E. Haddock, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Raymond E. Haddock to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks,
Mduvekot (talk) 20:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
June 2017
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Checkpoint Charlie. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 15:14, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the note. I won't perform any edits. My only issue was the critical deletion of my input. I was the last MP of Allied Checkpoint Charlie and to be called irrelevant trivia and deleted is amazing. Love Wikipedia so I will just be a reader but there are some really good information out there that will be missing because someone doesn't think it applies. All of it is trivia. Best Wishes and Thank you for the note. Feel free to block me. Mikelsey5 (talk) 15:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)