User talk:Mikehernandez

Please stop removing content from the Miguel Hernández page and replacing it with content of your own. Also, beware that the page you are writing looks like it may be a _vanity page_ if you are yourself Mike Hernández (you should refrain from writing pages about yourself -- if you're really worthy of an encyclopedia entry, someone else will write it). Tom

Image:Infidelitydetail.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Infidelitydetail.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miguel Hernandez (artist)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Miguel Hernandez (artist), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Questionable notability that lacks verification from a reliable third party source. Content appears to copy and pasted from www.puertoricoartist.com, a website the article subject is associated with, constituting a conflict of interest.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Barkeep^{Chat | $} 16:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]