User talk:Mikeeypee

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Degrassi (season 11), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 19:17, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tonight Tonight

Just want to point this out: when you made this update to the article Tonight Tonight (Hot Chelle Rae song), you left the old source up. That source is for the week of July 9th and still shows the song's peak position as #13. When you update sourced information, you can't leave the old source up unless the source has been updated as well. Otherwise it looks like information is sourced when it actually isn't. Do you have a source showing that Tonight Tonight has reached #10?
Thatotherperson (talk/contribs) 17:52, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind; someone else provided a source. Thatotherperson (talk/contribs) 18:58, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Talk That Talk, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 15:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk That Talk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. STOP adding that nonsense tracklist. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 20:36, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 01:29, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rihanna discography, you may be blocked from editing. You have removed references from this one article at least three times now, each time without explanation. I can't guess your reason for the deletion, but these references are necessary to support the claims of the peaks shown in the table. Removing them violates Wikipedia's principal of verifiability. Please don't do this again. And please do start using edit summaries. Thanks. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 01:37, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Katy Perry discography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Where did you see 94 for "The One That Got Away" (US), and why didn't you add it to the article? Where is your edit summary? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 07:03, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

removal of sources

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rihanna discography‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 22:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unverifiable information, contradicting sources

I nearly blocked your account as a "vandalism-only" account tonight, after I had to revert every edit you made today as contradicting the sources in the article. I went back through older edits, and found the problem: you are updating chart positions before the online sources the discography articles use update. That makes every edit you make contradict the sourcing in the article.

Don't do that. Wait a day until the sources update, and then make the changes to the article.—Kww(talk) 02:36, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't tell where you got 10 as the Hot 100 peak for "Mr. Know It All" in this edit of yours to Kelly Clarkson discography (and you didn't explain anything in your edit summary). The closest I can get is this page of the Hot 100 Week of November 05, 2011, where it's shown at 19, having peaked at 10. Are you not waiting as Kww suggested, or are you just making this number up? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 00:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning on this topic: you cannot insert unverifiable information. If you change a figure, indicate a new source that shows the new figure at the time of the edit. If you cannot provide a source that verifies your data, don't change it. If this happens again, I will block you from editing.—Kww(talk) 01:01, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to give you another message about how annoying it is to have unsourced data pop up in articles, but I see Kww has already given you a final warning. I also see it didn't help, since you made this edit to Rihanna discography at 11:04, 3 November 2011, a full 10 hours after Kww's notice above. Even now, I don't see "We Found Love" at #1 in Canada in any of the three applicable sources already in the article, and you didn't add anything new or (*sigh*) even provide an edit summary. I've reverted your unsourced addition. Kww may be along later. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 12:41, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for ignoring warnings about unverifiable information. Any admin can unblock when user agrees not to include information that contradicts the sources present in the article without updating the sources. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 13:36, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]