User talk:Mikeabundo

Welcome!

Hello, Mikeabundo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alai 05:35, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the page cosplay. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mirshariff 11:35, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Filipino

Welcome. Pls attach this cat to your user page if you like, Category:Filipino Wikipedians. Also, pls visit Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines, to see the latest on what's happening. --Noypi380 03:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Abundo

Pls evaluate Mike Abundo, thanks. --Noypi380 03:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again. Pls check out Mike Abundo again, vandalism occured. I reverted it back to your original work, but pls check out the history of the page, there were offensive additions done by 2 contributors. --Noypi380 13:52, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Noypi380. I appreciate your commitment to fighting vandalism. --Mikeabundo 14:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you want to put up that Wikipedia article? I'm not so sure you're notable, and if you are, it's for pretty unflattering reasons. It might be better to place that information in your User page instead, and have the article speedy-deleted. Noelle De Guzman (talk) 14:52, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Abundo has in fact been proposed for deletion. Please see WP:VAIN for some relevant concerns. If you do want it deleted, don't just delete all the text from the page. This isn't the same as deleting the article itself and actually complicates the deletion process. As the only non-vandal contributor to the page, you could request it be speedily deleted (if you want) by adding {{db-author}} to the top of the article.

Or if you think the article should be kept, make sure it meets the guidelines at WP:BIO. NickelShoe 02:11, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To Abundo - that comment ("fighting vandalism") was not from me. You committed misrepresentation. --Noypi380 04:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the cut-and-paste typo. Corrected. :) -- Mikeabundo, 11:55, 27 March 2006.

Afd Philippine Cyberservices Corridor

Hey, there are new arguments in the AfD. Hoping to change your mind in the vote.... --Noypi380 03:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comment

Please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Mikeabundo. Exploding Boy 02:58, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cosplay video vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KI 16:36, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike. Some users are saying that adding a link to your forum [1] is not notable. Please discuss this on the talk page. Thanks. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 18:04, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning: Cosplay

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. In fact, you've already reverted four times: any more, and I'll block you for at least 24 hours immediately. Please address the concerns about this addition on the article talk page, and make sure you're familiar with Wikipedia:External links and Wikipedia:Spam. Alai 17:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jerrypolence.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jerrypolence.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —293.xx.xxx.xx 09:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

blog linking

Please do not link your blog entries to articles like what you did to ABS-CBN and GMA Network. It is a violiation of Wikipedia's policy. (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for details). thanks! -Danngarcia 16:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links

The link you have added to Angel Locsin violates the external link guidelines and conflict of interest guidelines (WP:EL and WP:COI). Links to Flickr are strongly discouraged by the guidelines and link to a website that scrapes Flickr photos and adds advertising is even more inappropriate. Furthermore, linking to your own website is strongly discouraged by the "conflict of interest" guidelines. Please review these guidelines and reconsider your edits. Thanks. Nposs 05:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Tishaabundo.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tishaabundo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. bluemask ^(talk) 11:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Jerrypolence.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jerrypolence.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 23:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zaido: Pulis Pangkalawakan edits

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Zaido: Pulis Pangkalawakan appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. -Danngarcia 14:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please Help for Zaido

I am the "Karakuka" who posted at your blog who is trying to restore the editings placed on the Zaido Wiki entry. I propose that we present the criticisms about the series in a professional and formal manner so as not to get under fire of Wikipedia administrators handling the article (who unfortunately are Kapusos). Could you supply me with further points of discussion to add in the page? Thank you. Supaagekireddo 22:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs ≠ Reliable sources

Please read reliable sources and also conflict of interest as linking to your own website to show off your own criticism of a series is most definitely against policy. Criticism should not come from a few choice blog posts, as it skews the POV away from neutral. Please read up on these policies.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The criticism section has no sources. Stop putting it back.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The references used such as this one aren't like blog entries to me. If you can give me decent sources for the "criticism of fans of Shaider" section, find them, and put that in the article. Every other reference in the article works out except for those that were in the "criticism" section that I gutted, someone else removed, and then it was replaced without references. Fix that.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's what you should try to salvage—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine WikiCon

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed blackout in protest of RA 10175

Dear Mikeabundo,

Greetings!

As a Filipino Wikipedian, I hope you are aware of the passage of Republic Act No. 10175, also known as the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, which was signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III on September 12, 2012. Currently, there is a discussion on the Tambayan, the noticeboard for Philippines-related topics, about a proposed blackout of the English Wikipedia in the Philippines in order to protest the passage of RA 10175, similar to the blackout against SOPA and PIPA held earlier this year. I feel that your input on the subject will definitely help in the discussion.

Please feel free to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines#The Cybercrime Prevention Act, and I hope your input will help the Filipino Wikipedia community determine which is the best course of action against this law. Similarly, we hope to get as much input from as many Wikipedians as possible.

Thank you and maraming salamat po!

Kind regards,

Sky Harbor ^(talk) 12:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]