User talk:Mike Littlejohn

Welcome!

Hello, Mike Littlejohn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page List of programs broadcast by Teletoon have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:40, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Littlejohn, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mike Littlejohn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

KidsClick

Is there any particular reason you feel the need to vandalize that article repeatedly with the same unsourced information? Damnedfan1234 (talk) 23:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

Hi there, re: this, article talk pages are for discussing improvements to articles, not for general chatter about the subject. Please refrain from posting unless you are talking about specific changes to be made. See our talk page guidelines. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Damnedfan1234. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to KidsClick have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Damnedfan1234 (talk) 22:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at KidsClick. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. If you have a source for this information cite it, but given how often you've constantly added random shows, you're clearly just making things up. Damnedfan1234 (talk) 18:57, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

In case you haven't read the WP:AN discussion, read the final warnings above and take them to heart. Any further disruption and I'll immediately block you from editing Wikipedia; this is an encyclopedia, not your personal sandbox. ‑ Iridescent 21:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Digifan23

User:Digifan23 claim down I'm not going to hurt you I here to help you Mike Littlejohn (talk) 20:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at KidsClick, you may be blocked from editing. Damnedfan1234 (talk) 00:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing and logged-out vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User: Ponyo

Unblock me I promise I never do it again. Mike Littlejohn (talk) 21:42, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have to convince another admin with Checkuser to review the block using instruction in your block template. You've been editing disruptively and while logged-out for ages, I doubt you'll get much traction on an unblock request.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Thank you Ponyo I'll promise I'll be unblock tomorrow. Mike Littlejohn (talk) 21:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Damnedfan1234. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to KidsClick have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Damnedfan1234 (talk) 02:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Universal Kids

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Universal Kids, you may be blocked from editing. Jena (talk) 21:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at KidsClick, you may be blocked from editing. Damnedfan1234 (talk) 13:22, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Account reblocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for disruptive editing through logged-out vandalism and talk page attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:13, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I have been blocked from editing until Tuesday I can continued. Mike Littlejohn (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Umm Jezebel's Ponyo it's November 30th I need to get back to editing. Can you unblock me? Mike Littlejohn (talk) 14:56, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

I will be unblock on Thursday right? Mike Littlejohn (talk) 15:22, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, at 22:11 UTC (which is about 5 1/2 hours from now).--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:46, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Turning Mecard, you may be blocked from editing. Damnedfan1234 (talk) 01:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that Mike Littlejohn (talk) 01:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mike Littlejohn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Superkeegan9100. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 22:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anything just fine, no sock puppetry. Mike Littlejohn (talk) 06:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again by way of all-caps shouting in edit summaries, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 15:42, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are on a no-all caps restriction, indefinitely. Drmies (talk) 15:43, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Mike Littlejohn (talk) 21:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New year

Happy New Year Eve everyone Mike Littlejohn (talk) 14:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You IP socked since your last block. You like to try to edit war things into articles with IPs and also on Dec. 19 you tried to vandalize someone's talkpage a few times to harass them. After your block expires, you will always need to edit while logged in because if you get caught IP socking after that, you will receive an indefinite block. Also, you will need to find other ways to edit when your block expires because certain ranges have been blocked for longer periods and they will not be unblocked for you to use. There weren't any good edits whatsoever on those ranges and they have been shut down.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

I will be gone for this week.

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ToThAc (talk) 14:11, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 11:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've made your block indefinite since you decided to sock with BagelandBeckyfan 2002 while blocked. Technically indistinguishable.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 11:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Berean Hunter: The latest sock appears to be Ruby Gloom Fan 2002, continuing the user's refusal to cite sources ([1] [2]). Sro23 (talk) 05:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Sro23, you are spot on.

Confirmed:
Jake Gelsin (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Ruby Gloom Fan 2002 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Mike Littlejohn (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
— Berean Hunter (talk) 12:06, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]