User talk:Mike Doughney/Archive/Oct-2008

Enjoying it...

Hmm. I delete totally rude comments, by 'christians'. Yet you criticize me?

The citation you [1] gave me. Stats "Removing personal attacks" is okay and is a guideline for Wikipedia and comment editing and I did that, that is adhearing to Wikipedia's standards. Those type of attacks are uncalled for in Wikipedia.

If you enjoy the comments. Then fine. I'll let you enjoy that type of filth.

But as for Wiki's standards. I'm obeying them in this point and your not. --Monkey225 (talk) 20:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

your undo of my edit to the topic heavy water

I strongly do not agree with your undo of my edit that it is off point. Before my edit, and now as you have left it with your undo, the paragraph reads that there is no evidence that heavy water reactors have been used to make weapons grade fissile material. My edit had removed that mistake and fallacy until you undid it. My edit comes primarily from the Wikipedia topic itself describing "Clark Laboratories" outside Ottawa. In that topic, the Wikipedia reads that Clark used CANDU reactors (which are heavy water reactors) and they made 250kg of fissile material for weapons. My edit also contained information on President Jimmy Carter because the Wikipedia topic on Jimmy Carter specifically talks about his work cleaning up Clark Laboratories. My edit provides information that is useful to the public to remove a mistake that perpetuates the untruth that civilian reactors are not linked to weapons production. Your undo is a typical obfuscation and denial of the truth. --Adoptstraycats (talk) 06:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

There is no Wikipedia entry for "Clark Laboratories." Please provide a link to whatever article contains this assertion. If you are referring to the "Chalk River Laboratories," I have seen no evidence supporting your specific allegation that fissile materials were produced in a "civilian heavy water power reactor" in Canada of any kind (such power reactors are unsuited for the production of such materials) at Chalk River or anywhere else for that matter. There have been a number of reactors at Chalk River, research reactors which do not qualify as "civilian heavy water power reactors" which would have been used to produce such materials. Further, there has never been a CANDU reactor at Chalk River, the first reactor of that design was at the nearby Nuclear Power Demonstration site, nearly 30km away from Chalk River. Mike Doughney (talk) 07:26, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Atheism and Rick Joyner

• Hi, I saw your edit on Talk:Francis Frangipane. I responded there with a suggestion for a stub article.
• I am a (retired at age 26) mathematician and former other stuff on my user page. I am also director of the Thomas Henry Huxley and Aldous Huxley Foundation. Aldous was a Werner Heisenberg style poly-consciousness mystic (coming into vogue with the new "post human" neuroscience and "Singularity is near" stuff). Aldous was also a historian who wrote The Devils of Loudun, about ergot in the grain leading to witch hunting and "posession". T.H. ("Darwin's Bulldog") was the first person to provide a good empirical argument against the existence of classic creation-myth-God, and he coined the term agnostic (I am not one, as a strict skeptic as defined on my user page, but I was just pulled in to be director by the late charming Laura Huxley).
• If you have an interest in this stuff, perhaps you could weigh in on Wasilla Assembly of God, Thomas Muthee, and Wasilla Bible Church, or at least help monitor the articles from incessant deletions of sourced neutral facutal information, which is frequently deleted for partisan political purposes. Tautologist (talk) 16:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)