User talk:MikeWeiner476

Welcome

Sorry this is late!

Welcome...

Hello, MikeWeiner476, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —SusanLesch (talk) 08:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Gold Medal Park

I saw your note on James' page, I thought I would offer my input. "Promotional" means that the article sounds like a press release rather than a grounded encyclopedia article. For example you have:

"Minneapolis opened the 7.5-acre Gold Medal Park in May 2007. It consists of a 32-foot-high mound, reached by a spiral walkway rising out of a green lawn with 300 trees. The park, just east of the Guthrie Theater, provides the Mill District neighborhood with some rare green space.[1]"

Reword to be more neutral and less promotional, i.e.:

"The Gold Medal Park is a park in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The 7.5 acre park was opened in May 2007; it consists of a..."

Do you see the difference? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 17:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David has it, the article seems to be written like a news article rather than an encyclopedia article. News articles are worded differently, their opening sentence has to be interesting in order to draw the reader in, encyclopedia articles only need to convey the info. The most obvious wording is in the headlines of newspapers, often they aren't even grammatically correct but they cram a lot of info into a few words to stand out.

Take a look at some other park articles for ideas and hints of what else could be included. One that's in pretty good shape is Central Park (the one in New York City). Try to avoid using adjectives that promote the park, even though you won't get any profit from writing the article. Because most sources will have a positive spin it will probably come through unless you make an effort to avoid it (I found myself almost promoting the Maserati MC12 when I was writing that article).

Finally, the tag probably won't be removed unless you remove it yourself, there are so many articles on Wikipedia that it's unlikely that anyone will notice that you've imrpoved it. After you've done another few edits I'll see what I can do to help. James086^{Talk | Email} 02:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of AmericInn Hotels

A tag has been placed on AmericInn Hotels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 18:14, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Medal Park

Greetings, MikeWeiner476. Nice of you to start that article. It was missing for a long time. I went to near that park when the bridge collapsed. Anyway it looks good and thank you again. -SusanLesch (talk) 05:15, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WestLegalEdCenterLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WestLegalEdCenterLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]