User talk:Mike6271/Archive 1

Warning

Watch your reverts at Power Rangers: Dino Thunder. Somehow, you did this.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:29, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Skalskal, I replied on your talk page.  I do not understand why you warned me, then put me up for admin intervention against this vandalism in which I have not been able to find.  If you look at my contribs, I did not vandalize Jewish Identity.  It just turned out that when I clicked undo, it brought it back to an edit with vandalism in it.  I then reverted it to a further point, which solved the problem of the vandalism.  Unless I missed something, next time, please do not come here and give me a blatant vandal then put me up for admin intervention.  Thanks! Mike6271 20:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I scanned your changes there, I first found a blatant vandalism (Ian Holloway) in your edit, then a further edit with a smaller hidden message from "Mike Church", assumed this was you. After multiple edits appearing to denigrate the article, I failed to realize that your edits were merely correction attempts reverting to previously vandalized portions, my bad. ---Skalskal (the actual bad edits were inserted by 204.39.48.16 ).

Okay! Feel free to check out Wikipedia:Recent_changes_patrol, as it provides information on patrolling for recent changes. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

No prob, sorry for the YELL! in error.

Thanks! Mike6271 20:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the userpage revert!

Thanks for your revert to my userpage. --SonicChao ^talk 23:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

             -No problem! Mike6271 23:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Mike6271,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Prodego ^talk 22:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Keating

Hi Mike. Paul Keating, being an article on an Australian politician, uses Australian rather than US spellings. Cheers, Slac speak up! 05:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that! I didn't realize that he was Australian. I will be more careful next time! Thanks for pointing that out to me! Mike6271 05:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool. Wikipedia policy is that spelling should be consistent within an article, so if you see an article that has all-Commonwealth spellings in it, it's probably best to leave it like that. Slac speak up! 05:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Mike6271 05:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Mike6271! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego ^talk 00:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could be a bug that is pending a fix, or it could be other things. Make sure you downloaded and installed all the files in the zip, and that you extracted it. Make sure you have cookies enabled in Internet Explorer. Prodego ^talk 01:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank is possible (ever probable perhaps, I would need to see the source code of VP to know for sure, which I have not). Anyway I changed the name over for you. Prodego ^talk 00:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Westmar High School

It really looks like somebody copy/pasted that info there and is not very encyclopedic. Corpx 02:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it does look very unencyclopedic. Would you like me to remove "unencyclopedic" information from it? Mike6271 02:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

I added cleanup tags. Somebody with more knowledge on the article will hopefully fix it up. Corpx 03:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calculus

I was trying to revert the edit by 74.111.152.98, but Anti-Vandal Bot did it sooner, so I ended up reverting AVB's revert. Black Falcon 03:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that! I have removed the warning! Mike6271 03:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. I know how hectic the RC patrol is (I only started watching the recent changes 2-3 days ago: I had no idea WP had so much vandalism!). Cheers, Black Falcon 03:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VandalSniper

You've been approved to use VandalSniper. Please let me know if you have any problems getting it working. --Chris (talk) 19:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quick on the trigger, unhelpful to the max

The least you could do was to wait for me to post my explanation on the talk page before reverting my edit and posting a vandalism warning. I'm not amused, and I'll be watching for this behavior in the future.--Curtis Clark 04:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

Many thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage! Rama's arrow 04:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Revert

Why did you revert my revert on Personal computer? I was reverting vandalism and you think I'm the vandal.

Here's what I did. I took out the melissa. You put it back in. _{iSeeYou ★ Talk to me} 22:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]