User talk:Humberto Valle

October 2013

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Unthink. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. m.o.p 02:40, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Humberto Valle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

humbertovalle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

My edit wasn't meant to be of promotional. the unthink page right now is already a promotional page for a startup. The issue that i tried changing was the fact the are many startups launched each month, each year, yet non get a wikipedia page...why should the Unthink page have one and not allow others to clarify the differentiation between the authors, movements, and companies who are global like Unthink (not the social startup) to also list and clarify their existence and difference from the one that is listed for the social netowrk startup that didn't even launch. I'm a contributor elsewhere and love helping people and love reading. I would love the opportunity to contribute whenever I can.

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from Wikipedia:Changing username and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The requested rename will come out as 'Humbertovalle'. Would you prefer HumbertoValle or Humberto Valle? Just Chilling (talk) 01:00, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As requested on my talk page, I have renamed you as 'Humberto Valle'. Just Chilling (talk) 00:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming magneticphysiotherapy.com

Hello, I'm Jytdog. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 02:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest and paid editing in Wikipedia

Hi Humberto Valle. I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing. Your edits to date are typical of those of someone who edits Wikipedia for marketing purposes on behalf of clients. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.

Hello, Humberto Valle. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

Comments and requests

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by our WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have edited Wikipedia on behalf of clients or with any connection with entities about which you have edited? Please do keep in mind that this disclosure is obligatory. After you respond (and you can just reply below), I can walk you through how the "peer review" part happens and then I can provide you with some more general orientation as to how this place works. Please reply here, just below, to keep the discussion in one place. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 02:17, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please reply here? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 13:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]