User talk:Mihailo79

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Brussels agreement (2013)

Hello Mihailo79,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Brussels agreement (2013), may be copied from http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2013&mm=04&dd=19&nav_id=85799. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 11:22, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is a text of agreement, the same on all sources. Other sources are also used, from Constitution, Law, and as parts of journal tells. Thank you for your support. Mihailo79 (talk) 11:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Kosovo–Serbia relations, you may be blocked from editing. bobrayner (talk) 17:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning . Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee remedies that govern edits to these articles. You can read the full decision here. Thank you.

Nomination of Dunav osiguranje for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dunav osiguranje is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunav osiguranje until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TJH2018 talk 21:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Banca Intesa Beograd, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am the source. I have problem with bank that i have wrote here. It is my testemony. Should i call some newspapers and publish it first than cite that as reference. Please give me advice for this situation. I have done about 1000 changes and new articles in wiki serbia and few on english wiki. Mihailo79 (talk)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Banca Intesa Beograd. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 10:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot be the source for any information you add, as that contravenes WP:V, WP:RS + WP:COI - Arjayay (talk) 10:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC) Ok, thanks for the advice Mihailo79 (talk).[reply]

Dunav osiguranje

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --AirWolf ^talk 14:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Kim Kardashian. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for the advice. Mihailo79 (talk)

I am very sorry if my reputation in wiki communiti is geting worse. It is very important thing for me. I will give my best to get back on the right wiki community way. Mihailo79 (talk)

Note

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:50, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for providing me with this information. I must admit my mistake because i have wrote an information that i got in some unformal way. Wiki community as the good way of life. Mihailo79 (talk)

Signing talkpage posts

Hi, Mihailo. Please always use four tildes, ~~~~ , to sign a post, as that will give both your signature and timestamp. Not just three tildes, which will give the signature only. The timestamp is useful for people trying to follow discussions. Bishonen | talk 15:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC). Ok, thanks. Mihailo79 (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dunav osiguranje. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Several editors have pointed out to you that the content you are adding is inappropriate. If it is unclear to you why this is the case, please start a discussion on the article's talk page, but don't just add the same text again. The claims need independent sourcing, not primary sources, and the images are mostly irrelevant to the article. bonadea contributions talk 10:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mihailo79. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Dunav osiguranje, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I admit, i am working there. I did the page and maintaining it for free. I dont get any money for it. Mihailo79 (talk) 14:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't be editing the article at all, let alone causing the disruption you have. You may be able to avoid a block if you commit to stop editing the article at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Dunav_osiguranje. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is ok, i dont have any will to build enciklopedia that is against freedom of style and estetic values. Mihailo79 (talk) 14:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe if you studied the manual of style you might see where you went wrong. Blackmane (talk) 14:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Shortcuts

   MOS:IM
   MOS:SANDWICH

Main page: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images See also: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility § Images, Wikipedia:Image use policy, and Wikipedia:Picture tutorial

   Each image should be inside the level 2 section to which it relates, within the section defined by the most recent ==Heading== delimited by two equal signs, or at the top of the lead section. Do not place images immediately above section headings.
   Avoid sandwiching text horizontally between two images that face each other, and between an image and an infobox or similar.
   It is often preferable to place images of people so that they "look" toward the text. Do not achieve this by reversing the image.
   Any galleries should comply with WP:Image use policy § Image galleries. Consider linking to additional images on Commons instead.
   Avoid referring to images as being to the left/right, or above/below, because image placement varies with platform, and is meaningless to people using screen readers; instead, use captions to identify images.
   An image's |alt= text takes the image's place for those who are unable to see the image. See WP:ALT.

Because the gallery was changed. I have read carerfuly and the gallery i have created is apsolutely in accoudance with Manual of Style. We have here some other, personal problem. It has nothing to do with Manual of Style or if it has, point me please to the part of Manal of Style (Gallery) that wasnt in accordance with the gallery i have created. Mihailo79 (talk) 14:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That would be "The images in the gallery collectively must have encyclopedic value and add to the reader's understanding of the subject. " As explained by several different people, the images in the gallery you added did not do that. One of them had such encyclopedic value, but the rest of them did not, individually or collectively. See also MOS:PERTINENCE : "Images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context, not primarily decorative." Since a number of people agree that the images do not belong, and have Wikipedia policy to fall back on, it's not a personal matter. --bonadea contributions talk 15:07, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This was the gallery about which has made all this problem.

Gallery

Gallery redacted because of NFCC issues --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:45, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would like that more peopple include in resolving of this problem. Lets make a survay, not because of my block but because of resolving this issue. Thanks Mihailo79 (talk) 14:50, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let's not. The community has wasted enough time on you already. Your access to this talkpage has now also been revoked. If you wish to appeal the block, you may do so via UTRS. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mihailo79 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20515 was submitted on Feb 02, 2018 18:33:03. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:33, 2 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mihailo79 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20521 was submitted on Feb 03, 2018 16:56:03. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:56, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]