User talk:Mihaigheza

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. The links you added to the page SpreadsheetGear for .NET have been removed. Please do not add commercial links—or links to your own private websites—to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 23:45, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ActiveXLS

Hi - the best thing you can do to help the ActiveXLS page would be to provide references from reliable sources for the content in the article. In order for any article to remain on Wikipedia, its content must be verifiable. Please see the 3 guidelines I have linked to above (WP:CITE, WP:RS & WP:V) for more information on this. If you still have further questions, feel free to let me know. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 15:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Mihaigheza, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 15:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eliberatica

I'm afraid the conference, important as it may be in its own field, is simply not of encyclopedic calibre. Conferences that are encyclopedic include the Wannsee Conference, the Conference of Lausanne or UNCLOS III. If you'd like a second opinion on the matter, you may wish to speak to User:William Pietri, who deleted the article. Biruitorul 05:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Eliberatica-logo.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Eliberatica-logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ActiveFailSafe

ActiveFailSafe has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 21:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MiniCard MadammeTussauds.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:MiniCard MadammeTussauds.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minicards

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Minicards, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ERealty

The article ERealty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a WP:NEO. No assertion of notability, and no sources have been provided. Unable to find anything further online. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FuriouslySerene (talk) 13:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]