User talk:Microplant

Welcome!

Hello, Microplant, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mortee (talk) 23:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Branson, Cool S

Hi Microplant, welcome to Wikipedia. Could you help me find some corroboration for the "deleted Richard Branson tweet" you added to Cool S? I can't find anyone tweeting as a result of it, or any Google hits for things like "richard branson" "sketched out this s". I'm sceptical, but if the tweet happened and gets reported on somewhere then it'd be a great addition to the article. Mortee (talk) 23:41, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Microbit Game Corp (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Microbit Game Corp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Microbit Game Corp, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 01:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Microplant, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 01:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Technological singularity has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Technological singularity was changed by Microplant (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.935049 on 2018-01-26T15:32:52+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:32, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Artificial intelligence. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jith12 (talk) 23:50, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 4chan, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Christopher Poole. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:55, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:03, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Microplant (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have received warning saying that my next move would cause me to be banned from editing. Without warning my account was removed when I edited a page adding the text “The history of Gladstone Missouri is Unknown”. Could I have checked my sources? Yes, Yes I could. I will refrain from performing an act without checking my sources again however, I doubt not checking sources is a reason for me to be blocked. Perhaps I could recieve one last chance showing if “lack of checking sources” happens again, I could be banned forever. I’d appreciate the ability to increase the knowledge given to everyone via Wikipedia once again. Though it isn’t necessary I think it’d help everyone out with yet another mind working to improve this great site. Microplant (talk) 7:11 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Based on your edits and your response here, I'm not convinced that this account can be and will be used productively on Wikipedia. only (talk) 00:43, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Microplant (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20458 was submitted on Jan 28, 2018 01:37:05. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:37, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]