User talk:MicroMacroMania

Welcome!

Hello, MicroMacroMania, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

Aint here to please (talk) 08:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, MicroMacroMania. You have new messages at Qwertyus's talk page.
Message added 20:42, 25 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

QVVERTYVS (hm?) 20:42, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taxation in Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social Security. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Biogeographic variation in brain size may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

with "brain size". All the content is over there now.. Anyway thank you for anyone who helped :)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:02, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Taxation in Bosnia and Herzegovina

added a link pointing to Social Security

Taxation in Croatia

added a link pointing to Social Security

Taxation in Italy

added a link pointing to Social Security

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

A question?

Have you edited articles related to race previously under a different username? Editing under different usernames is not in itself a sanctionable offense, but doing so in a deceptive way or to try to avoid or bypass sanctions is. I am asking because some of your edits are very similar to the edits of a previous editor. User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 03:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

huh?.. Which user do my edits remind you of?MicroMacroMania (talk) 06:28, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:DavidJac123 was inserting and reinserting the exact same content in to the article on Richard Lynns "Race Differences in Intelligence (book)" without consensus, that you are now inserting, also without prior attempts at forming a consensus. He also liked editing articles on topics related to taxation. If you used the DavidJac123 account previously but decided to switch to this one, it would be useful to know, because of the long history of deceptive sockpuppetry at R&I related articles. User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 19:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems correct enough... But my former was not blocked.. Shifted name cause it was deleted under three month deleting rule..MicroMacroMania (talk) 07:40, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The account DavidJac123 is not deleted. By the way if you want to discuss editing related issues with someone in Danish, you can reach me at my talkpage at Danish wiki.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 14:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?? The name does not appear of it anymore.. And password dont work either.. Probably just me...MicroMacroMania (talk) 14:36, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to restore the material that was removed from the "Race differences in intelligence" article, what you should do is reopen the RFC that I opened about whether to include it. Both of the uninvolved editors who commented in the RFC (Markbasset and Solarra) were in favour of including it. The conclusion reached at ANI is that the RFC was improperly closed, but also that it should be reopened only if the article wasn't deleted at AFD and if you weren't blocked as a sockpuppet. Neither of those things happened, so there's nothing preventing you reopening the RFC, if you want the removed material to be restored. 203.172.214.142 (talk) 07:24, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I dont really see the reason. I already have enough disagreement for my ideas from people. So I think I will just let it go.. MicroMacroMania (talk) 07:53, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maunus, I saw MicroMacroMania make this edit to the Blond article minutes ago. And when I saw that MicroMacroManiam had removed File:Vanuatu blonde.jpg in that edit, it reminded me of SwediePie (talk · contribs). So I looked into MicroMacroMania's edit history; it's easy to see that, by the MicroMacroMania account's very early edits to Wikipedia (including the quick creation of his user page, which is something WP:Sockpuppets usually do to immediately blend in, and WP:Newbies usually don't do so soon), MicroMacroMania is not new to editing Wikipedia. The WP:Clean start policy is clear that MicroMacroMania should not be editing the same articles he edited before if this latest Wikipedia account of his is truly a WP:Clean start. Flyer22 (talk) 10:10, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And judging by the discussion above in this section, the MicroMacroMania account is not a WP:Clean start account. MicroMacroMania should declare his previous account on his user page, and probably at the top of his talk page, especially because of the #Reminder section above (the sanctions matter). Flyer22 (talk) 10:17, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? I removed the picture because it fills too much and there is already another pictue with a blond haired aborigine, so it seemed like it filled too much in the text. But you are welcome to but it back in...MicroMacroMania (talk) 10:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't much care about the removal of that image. I care about you abiding by the WP:Sockpuppeting and WP:Clean start policies I noted above. You should most certainly note your previous account on your user page, given that your MicroMacroMania account is not a WP:Clean start account and given the aforementioned sanctions. Flyer22 (talk) 10:51, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned above, my former account was not blocked. MicroMacroMania (talk) 11:16, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is not the point. Your former account was somewhat problematic, and you are involved in editing areas where sanctions are in place. You were also editing Wikipedia with both accounts at one point, as this link shows. So your "[s]hifted name cause it was deleted under three month deleting rule" explanation is invalid; it's invalid anyway because Wikipedia does not delete accounts "under [a] three month deleting rule." There is no "three month deleting rule." I suggest you read and comprehend the policies I pointed you to. Or better yet, I will ask at the sanctions page if you should declare your past account on your user page. Flyer22 (talk) 01:16, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ok? Do what you want man.. What ever keeps you happy. but I got other things to do.. So I am going to continue do as I use to... To be honest I cant see the issue.MicroMacroMania (talk) 17:16, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where are you getting your guidance on what sources to choose for editing articles?

I'm wondering how you are finding the sources you are using for editing the several articles you are editing that are subject to discretionary sanctions on Wikipedia. See you on the talk pages of the articles for discussion of appropriate sources. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 11:53, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]