User talk:Mickgill
File copyright problem with File:MeForWeb.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:MeForWeb.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 16:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks mickgill (talk) 07:47, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:MeForWeb.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:MeForWeb.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 14:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
File:Mick Gill.jpg missing description details
[edit]
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:02, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Sorry about late reply. Image is of Me, taken by Me. Was going to use it on my user page. mickgill (talk) 06:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Road to Perdition. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Quentin X (talk) 14:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Don't know what you mean, by considering My contribution as Vandalism. My edit is valid as Tyler Hoechlin has second billing in the Film, as per IMDB and other media. See here: Road to Perdition (2002) - IMDb mickgill (talk) 15:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- The infobox goes on what is on the billing block of the poster. If you go to Template:Infobox film you'll see. I considered it 'vandalism' as you were just reverting for no reason while I was giving a reason. I guess 'vandalism' is a catch all word on here. Quentin X (talk) 15:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oh yes, I see what you mean by, as per the 'infobox' example on Template page. Thank you for that. mickgill (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- The infobox goes on what is on the billing block of the poster. If you go to Template:Infobox film you'll see. I considered it 'vandalism' as you were just reverting for no reason while I was giving a reason. I guess 'vandalism' is a catch all word on here. Quentin X (talk) 15:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)