User talk:Mickeeyone
Speedy deletion nomination of Arche17
[edit]Hello Mickeeyone,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Arche17 for deletion, because it seems to be an promotion, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, →Σσς. (Sigma) 23:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of ArchE17, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Arche17. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 01:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of ArchE17
[edit]Hello Mickeeyone,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ArchE17 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, YuMaNuMa Contrib 01:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
The article ArchE17 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article does not have reliable secondary sources
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FrankDev (talk) 02:09, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ArchE17 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArchE17 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FrankDev (talk) 02:25, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 13:03, 14 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
FrankDev (talk) 13:03, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Mickeeyone, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi Mickeeyone! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |