User talk:Michiganmd

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:EAASURGERY.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:EAASURGERY.JPG. The copy called Image:EAASURGERY.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 03:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:LSI1.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:LSI 1.jpg. The copy called Image:LSI 1.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 03:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:BSRB1.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:BSRB1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Iamunknown 05:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About the images you uploaded

Please do not re-upload copyrighted images to Wikipedia. You do not have the rights to release them under the GFDL. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:02, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. If you continue to upload apparently-copyrighted images without explanation, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:15, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At the bottom of both pages you have sent me appears the standard notice, that the images are all copyrighted by the Regents of the University of Michigan. I've forwarded your concern to some people who know more about what exactly needs to be done for you to be able to release the images. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:23, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The trick is that we need someone who represents the Board of Regents to agree to release those images under the GFDL, which they may or may not want to do. Posting the image under that license requires that they give us the right to allow others to use them for profit, and to modify the images without restriction - many people won't necessarily do that. I'd recommend you hold off on uploading any images, and we'll wait until we hear from someone who knows more than I do about this kind of thing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:57, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michiganmd. You may want to follow the procedures at When permission is confirmed. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 18:33, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]