User talk:Michardav

Your recent editing history at Jews shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the quote "[the] genome of European Jews is a mosaic of ancient peoples and its origin is largely Khazar" does not appear in the study you have cited, nor does it even arrive at this conclusion. These are violations of WP:NOR, WP:SYNTH, and WP:VANDALISM guidelines. I understand that you are new here, but this is unacceptable behavior. I recommend reading up on the rules here, so as to improve your editing.Evildoer187 (talk) 06:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Michardav. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 19:25, 25 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Orcs

I reverted your addition to Orc (Middle-earth). The conclusion you reach is perhaps reasonable, but it goes beyond what the books say, and therefore constitutes Original Research (OR) and is therefore typically not acceptable content. -- Elphion (talk) 05:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kalandia

The town of Kalandia and the former Kalandia refugee camp are located approximately 1000 meters apart in the part of the West Bank that is on the Israeli side of the Security Barrier. The refugee camp is abandoned, except for a few industrial buildings on the grounds of the former Jerusalem (Atarot) Airport. Most Palestinians from the camp now live in the town of Kalandia and surrounding villages. It is logistically impossible for 10,000+ people to live in such a small village. A satellite map of the area confirms this. Mcnary1948 (talk) 00:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kalandia Map

Your PDF of the UNRWA fact sheet does not show the satellite image of Kalandia. It shows the town of Kafr 'Aqab, the northernmost Palestinian Arab neighborhood in East Jerusalem just north of the Security barrier. The obvious proof of this is the large white patch of land to the southeast. I don't know where you get your facts, but the satellite image of the area I posted was obtained from Google maps.

I am reverting your deletion, and request arbitration through a Wiki editor. I will be contacting them shortly requesting it, and will be relaying your threat towards me to them as well. Wiki is not a debate club where people have to "refute" your evidence. The satellite link I provided is proof enough that my revision should stand. I suspect it is you that has the political motivations, based on your past behavior here. Mcnary1948 (talk) 01:06, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kalandia

It doesn't matter how many NGO's use false or misleading information. You can quote them all day long. They are using a document that is simply not factual. I will compromise with you - Kalandia is indeed in Area "C". But there is no part of the town or refugee camp that is on the east side of the barrier. That is the neighborhood of Kafr 'Aqab. As soon as you pass through the Kalandia checkpoint, you're in that neighborhood. Those are the facts, and I know which way the editors will go once they view the satellite link I posted. My edit stands. Mcnary1948 (talk) 03:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIA notification

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Details of these sanctions can be found by following the link in the information box at the top of Talk:Kalandia. Zero^talk 02:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Even though you are correct about the refugee camp, fairness requires me to deliver this notice to you since I just delivered it to Mcnary1948. Just stay within the rules and all will be fine. Actually your last edit was a violation, just as Mcnary1948's last edit was a violation. If you are reported, being right won't help you. Zero^talk 02:42, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]