User talk:Michaelshea2004

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue to harass other editors, you may be blocked from editing. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 07:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

despite the verbal abuse in the edit logs i really do only change one or two words if an article was trashed under my name someone else probably got into my account or is on the same ip address Michaelshea2004 (talk) 07:05, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ProClasher97 it's not disruptive it's only minor Michaelshea2004 (talk) 08:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 08:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michaelshea2004 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

despite the verbal abuse in the edit logs i really do only change one or two words if an article was trashed under my name someone else probably got into my account or is on the same ip address Michaelshea2004 (talk) 06:54, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The edits from this account are either not constructive or have vulgar edit summaries since it was created a year and a half ago. I don't think someone else has been operating your account this entire time, and what others on your IP address do would not affect your account. I think it is just you deciding to be uncivil, and I don't think this is your first account. There is no reason here to lift the block. 331dot (talk) 07:43, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot but the edits themselves are only like one or two words ok fine maybe I was a bit annoyed that my ip address was blocked for 'cross-wiki abuse' when I was logged out and had nothing to do with me but why should I be banned for vulgar edit summaries not vandalizing an article? It doesn't make sense.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michaelshea2004 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the edits themselves are only like one or two words ok fine maybe I was a bit annoyed that my ip address was blocked for 'cross-wiki abuse' when I was logged out and had nothing to do with me but why should I be banned for vulgar edit summaries not vandalizing an article? It doesn't make sense to me. What do vulgar edit summaries have to do with 'disrupting edits'? How does that affect anyone else's ability to read articles? How is it 'disrupting edits' when I am only changing one or two words? I got annoyed with all the fact that my IP address was blocked for a limited time for 'cross-wiki abuse? when it had nothing to do with me (not that I'm expecting any of you to believe that) Seriously I'm sorry OK at least any of you could have given me a warning about that instead of going straight to the ban Oh well no more editing forever I guess Michaelshea2004 (talk) 09:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you see no problems with your edits, there are no grounds to consider lifting the block. Note also that you are not retired, you are blocked. Users who are not in good standing, as you are not, are not eligible to use that template. Yamla (talk) 10:20, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not reviewing this. But whether you edit in the future or not is up to you. Vulgar edit summaries are publicly viewable and do not contribute to a civil, collaborative environment with people from all over the world working together. People don't want to read that language when it is unnecessary. If you wouldn't say it in a public forum or in a professional enviornment, it really shouldn't be said here unless absoultely necessary. If you have edits you want to make, tell the next reviewer what they are. 331dot (talk) 10:09, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla 331dot are there any problems with my edits?! Or the whole entire ban is just because i left a fucking verbally abusive message in the edit summary? --Michaelshea2004 (talk) 23:06, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are very close to losing talk page access. Pings don't work unless you sign the post in which you ping. 331dot (talk) 20:26, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michaelshea2004 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can this account and all of my sockpuppet accounts get unblocked and unlocked in a minimum of six months time so that I can request a courtesy vanishing on all of them? Don't restore talk page access on them because I changed my password to a random string and removed my email address so I have no way to login to them.

Decline reason:

Please don't use IPs to make requests after your access to the talk page has been revoked. You can discuss this at UTRS. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Unblock/unban_request_for_Michaelshea2004_aka_Michaelshea04

I have closed your request as unsuccessful. You may appeal no sooner than January 16, 2025. Star Mississippi 19:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]