User talk:Michaelrm1256
December 2017
[edit]Hello, I'm Tornado chaser. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Stephen C. Meyer seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The change you made is quite controversial and should be discussed on the talk page first Tornado chaser (talk) 14:28, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen C. Meyer. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}
on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stephen C. Meyer was changed by Michaelrm1256 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960015 on 2017-12-06T20:39:53+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:39, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Stephen C. Meyer, you may be blocked from editing. Felicia (talk) 21:18, 6 December 2017 (UTC)