User talk:Michaelmorrison

"Parity"

The mention of the trademark application for Wikipedia is a tiny part of a larger, broader article about the development and founding of Wikipedia. The symbol is used once, deep in the body of the article, and not in the article's title. If and when the article about Time Machine is developed to the point where information about its trademark would be relevant, perhaps a similar small mention could be included. But at this point, the article hardly even mentions what the program does. I would suggest that if you really want people on Wikipedia to know what Time Machine is, you focus on writing... oh, I don't know, some information in the article about what the software does, rather than edit-warring over a useless and uninformative paragraph letting everyone know that it's been trademarked. FCYTravis 21:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And, so you decided as GOD of Wikipedia to delete the entire content? And why would you not even list you reasoning? Idiot!

"Content that violates any copyright will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. You agree to license your contributions under the GFDL*.

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Time Machine software.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 08:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Discussion at ANI

Hi,

Thought you'd like to know, recent activity by yourself and FCYTravis is being discussed at the Administrator's noticeboard.

As you are fairly new to Wikipedia, I thought you'd want to know. This is the venue where editing problems usually end up for examination by more experienced editors, if there is a concern that can't be sorted out on the spot. You're welcome to contribute, as is anyone who can shed light on the matter from different viewpoints.

Best,

FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 15:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I am new to this. And I did have a really hard time getting a request for mediation in place after numerous attempts with user FCYTravis failed. However, I still do not understand why there is no longer a Time Machine (Solution-Soft Software) page. I would like an explantion on that as well as the ability to roll-back the large amount of article text that was in there (not with (tm) symbol, prior to user|FCYTravis getting the giggles with the delete button.

Also, can I get some clarification why after following the example of (tm) used in the article for Wikipedia user|FCYTravis still felt it was OK to delete. Is there a double standard?

Articles for deletion nomination of Time Machine (Solution-Soft software)

I have nominated Time Machine (Solution-Soft software), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Machine (Solution-Soft software). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ridernyc (talk) 02:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Time Machine ("SolutionSoft Systems" software), you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. I'm sure you are aware of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Machine (Solution-Soft software). Toddst1 (talk) 01:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Michaelmorrison. You have new messages at Toddst1's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.