User talk:Michael Ronayne

To Leave a New Message
Please click here to start a new Section. Remember to sign your post with four tildes (~~~~). Thank you!

Speedy deletion of Kew Observatory

A tag has been placed on Kew Observatory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Roleplayer (talk) 22:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Kew Observatory, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. role^player 22:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kew Observatory

Hi, I have removed the speedy deletion tag and written a one sentence stub that will prevent the article being deleted while you work on it. Cheers Kevin (talk) 23:31, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Automatic registration...by photography"

This long section in the photography article deserves its own article, or perhaps should be merged into the inventor's article. But it feels like too much in the photography article. How about a mention and a link? Dicklyon (talk) 04:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'The House that Lives' listed for deletion

A page that you have been involved in editing, The House that Lives, has been listed for deletion; you may wish to participate in the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mattie ^TK 21:33, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the page myself. If I can’t take a break for dinner while editing a new page, I don’t think this is worth the effort. For the record, I was defining an entry on this page which you may also want to delete: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Registered_Historic_Places_in_Essex_County,_New_Jersey

I have quite a bit of historical background on this house which I will post elsewhere.

Michael Ronayne (talk) 23:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Hibiscus calyphyllus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hybrids and European (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:00, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michael Ronayne. You have new messages at Jim1138's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

re Raven's Progressive Matrices

Deletion of K-PAX (film) Post

Hi Michael, your post constituted "original research", hence my perhaps too brief comment: WP:OR, you'll need to find a "reliable source" or WP:RS to support your claims. - Oosh (talk) 21:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michael, all of what you propose: comparing works, emailing authors, etc. is original research. Unless you can find a reliable source that draws the same conclusions as what you posted it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. - Oosh (talk) 00:38, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]