User talk:Michael IFA

Welcome to the Wikipedia!

Hello, and Welcome to the Wikipedia, Michael IFA! Thanks for the contributiing the Free Zone link over on the Scientology article. Hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:

Take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial and Manual of Style.
When you have time, please peruse The five pillars of Wikipedia, and assume good faith, but keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
Always be mindful of striving for NPOV, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
If you need any help, post your question at the Help Desk.
Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!

And some odds and ends: Boilerplate text, Brilliant prose, Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Utilities, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes: ~~~~.

Best of luck, Michael IFA, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 03:01, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the page Diamond. Please do not add commercial links—or links to your own private websites—to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. Note that Wikipedia may see print or DVD publication, so we want more content, not more web links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. dewet|™ 13:24, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Free Zone article

Dont' be surprised if one of the OSA people revert you. The SP League is an OSA front and its whole purpose is to attack the Freezone.--Fahrenheit451 (talk) 02:40, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fahrenheit451,

Last I heard is that the Church IPs addresses have been blocked from changing wiki content, but of course they can always get more Ip addresses.

It has been deleted for copyright infringement of the IFA no less (don't laugh) So I will fix that and repost.

Michael IFA

June 2009

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article International Freezone Association, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Mfield (Oi!) 03:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake Mfield. As you say I should have read the relevant policies. I have sent you a message on your board.

I will redo the page properly and resubmit. I am the President of the association and tried to keep the posting as nuteral as possible with :just facts and no opinions.

Is it permissible to quote from the Association? I see that I have been quoted elsewhere on similar subjects [scientology free zone].

Thanks for the heads up.

Michael

IFA —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael IFA (talk • contribs)

Yes you can use relevant quotes sparingly - normally only for direct comments from persons - where the content cannot be included in any other way - you can use <blockquote>Put quotation here</blockquote> - (you will see the relvant tags below the edit window if you change the little pulldown menu to Wiki markup then you can highlight your quote and click on the tags to insert them around it). Mfield (Oi!) 17:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Logo-_International_Freezone_Association.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-_International_Freezone_Association.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mfield (Oi!) 03:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for the speedy deletion of International Freezone Association

The article International Freezone Association has been deleted, as it was comprised almost entirely of copyrighted material. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Most of this article was a direct copyright infringement of http://internationalfreezone.net, specifically http://internationalfreezone.net/Purposes.shtml and http://internationalfreezone.net/Goals.shtml. The site's content is clearly labelled as all rights reserved. We cannot accept verbatim copy adn pasting from copyrighted sources. The entire website contents would need to be released under a compatible free license like GFDL for copy and pasting to be permitted. This is the case whether or not you are an owner of the site/a copyright holder as we have no evidence of permission. Mfield (Oi!) 03:45, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answers to your questions

In response to your questions in this request, please read Wikipedia:PERMISSION which deals with the use of material from copyrighted sources. This details the reasoning for the OTRS ticketing system and the procedure for logging permissions with it. This will allow you to file a ticket that establishes your holding of copyright and thus your right to release the image (and other content) under a free license like CC or GFDL. As far as the content of the article goes, you can do the same with content from the website but there are some bigger issues. Firstly, Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral, and third party point of view and not make unsourced, claims or provide any facts that cannot be traced to reliable third party sources. Any content that has been written for your organization's own website is unlikely to fit this guideline, as the intention of your own website is obviously not to assess your organization as an balanced encyclopedia article would. The article should contain a balanced view of the organization complete with any notable criticism or press the organization has received. List of self proclaimed goals and mission statements are inappropriate, especially when written in the first person. A paragraph summary of the organizations goals in the form of "The International Freezone Associations self proclaimed goals are to blah blah blah<ref>http://www.internationalfreezoneassociation/Goals.shtml</ref>" (the reference between the ref tags will appear as a footnote - see WP:CITE) would be more in line with what we would be expecting to see. At the end of the day, as a leader of the organization, you are in a position where, even with the best of intent, it will be almost impossible for you to write a balanced, neutral encyclopedia entry on your organization. See the message above about conflict of interest and please read those guidelines thoroughly. Really, if your organization is notable, someone else will write an article about it. In the mean time, maybe you can create a very basic stub article that establises the notability or the organization and stays clear of any promotional claims or language, and other editors will expand it. Be very careful of the issues I have addressed here though, as future addition of non neutral language or any other COI editing will likely be jumped upon by other editors. Be sure to declare your involvement with the organization on the article talk page of the organizations article should it be recreated, any related articles that you contribute to. Hope this all clarifies the issues, please ask if you have any questions. Oh and you should always add talk page comments to the bottom of a talk page or they are likely to not get noticed, and sign them with 4 tildes like this: ~~~~. The Wikimedia software will substitute them with your username and a datestamp when you hit Save Page. Mfield (Oi!) 17:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page List of international professional associations do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. This looks also a problem with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Thanks, SchreyP ^(messages) 08:25, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]