User talk:MichaelEHowe

Morag siller

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Morag siller, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.moragsiller.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:44, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Morag Siller

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Morag Siller, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.moragsiller.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:43, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Morag Siller Copyright problem

Hello. The current creative commons license under which you have released your content is not compatible with the GFDL. In order to be acceptable, the best bet would be to (for the moment) use the GFDL license. Best wishes, – Toon ^(talk) 14:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no problem! Licensing can be confusing, but it is, in fact, very simple. In order to license something under the GFDL, all you have to do is place the text "This website is licensed under the GFDL" on your site. As the person with the material, you don't even need to link to the license, simply stating that you release the content under the GFDL is enough. I do suggest, however, that you also license the site under CC-BY-SA, that is this license, as Wikipedia is changing to this, and external GFDL licenses will not be permitted from August.

So, in short, place the text "This site is dual-licensed under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA 2.0" on your website, and you're sorted. I hope this makes sense now; I've spent most of today being confused myself! – Toon ^(talk) 01:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, I've taken the tag of the page. Best wishes, – Toon ^(talk) 12:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morag-Siller-Profile.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Morag-Siller-Profile.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]