User talk:Micahmpj
Don't read Yet Admins!
[edit]Hello. It said I was blocked from Wikipedia and I do not know why. So I want admins to read this
Micahmpj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I Want to be unblocked because I want to help make articles for people to read and find out interesting things that they don't know about. Even Though I'm a kid It doesn't mean that im not a good helper. I want to help Wikipedia. I know wikipeida isn't for raising money, its for Helping people learn. And Learning is good for our Brains. Its good to learn good things that we don't know about. Like what is was like when God Flooded the earth! I Believe in god. In God We trust.Micahmpj (talk) 23:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Why did I have to include god?
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Warning You are not allowed to delete answered unblock requests. You've been blocked for repeatedly making disruptive edits after warnings, having an account that is accessible by more than one person (possibly), and general WP:COMPENTENCE issues (read that link for more details). If you want to make further unblocks, you have to make a new unblock request. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- You didn't have to include a deity--what gave you that impression? Origamiteⓣⓒ 03:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
RETRY!
Micahmpj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I know I am blocked. I Will stop making the Valvecraft article. all I ever wanted to do is help. I Will respect the policy's and I will read and read until I understand it. and once I've read it. I will continue to edit. if I make a edit and a admin says "It is a good idea but I have removed it." I will respect that and I will move on instead of doing it over and over again. Wikipedia is a good place to learn. I Know not to remove pages without permission, I know not to be rude on Wikipedia . I know that I can edit and create articles. as I said if they say it was a good idea but then they remove it I respect that decision. i hope you understand Micahmpj (talk) 23:29, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
After reviewing your history of editing here, I'm afraid that you're not ready for editing Wikipedia yet. This is not a matter of revising the unblock request to say what you think we want to hear. It's a matter of growing up some more, and being more mature. I have no idea when that will be, but I've taken a wild guess, and set the block to expire in two years. Let's see how much things have changed then, maybe you'll be ready then, maybe not. In the mean time, I've removed talk page access; it isn't fair to you to make it look like more unblock requests will succeed when it is clear that they won't. Floquenbeam (talk) 01:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.