User talk:MicahR79
Welcome, MicahR79!
Hello, MicahR79, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Mr. Stradivarius, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Fun stuff...
{{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 15:25, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of The Sater Design Collection for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Sater Design Collection is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sater Design Collection until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GregJackP Boomer! 03:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 03:28, 27 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
GregJackP Boomer! 03:28, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello MicahR79. I've closed the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sater Design Collection as "userfy", and I have moved the article to your userspace accordingly. You can find it at User:MicahR79/The Sater Design Collection. I suggest submitting it at articles for creation if you can find references that support the subject's notability. Let me know if you have any questions about the process, and I'll be happy to help you out. Best regards — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 15:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sater Design Collection Logo.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Sater Design Collection Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Sater Design Collection.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 00:16, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi MicahR79, I would say that there are a number of issues to address with the "The Sater Design Collection" article. 'Notability' is borderline, generally with articles about companies we like to see at least some evidence of general news coverage, rather than only coverage that is local or specialist. The Orlando Sentinel article, for example, only name-checks Dan Sater once.
Another big problem (that has only been addressed in a small way) is the promotional nature of the article, which still reads like an advertisement in many places. This was the main problem that was raised at the AfD discussion. Prominent phrases like "servicing builders and individuals both nationally and internationally", "showcas[ing] the company’s trend-setting designs to the local and national market", "has earned an international reputation for luxury home design", "established [in] an effort to combine custom quality designs with more affordable pre-drawn plans", "has become one of the country's most recognized residential design firms" are all highly promotional and don't meet Wikipedia's requirement for verifiability and WP:NPOV.
Thirdly, the article is about the home plan company Sater Design Collection, therefore not about Dan Sater. Dan Sater's books are not relevant to the article. The spin-off companies such as Verandah Publishing, Designs Direct Publishing etc, should be mentioned briefly and neutrally, if at all.
I'm a member of WikiProject Architecture and try to look on articles about architecture or building designer practices sympathetically. Unfortunately there are too many unresolved issues to convince me to accept this one at the moment. Sionk (talk) 15:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Sater Design Collection, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Sater Design Collection, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Sater Design Collection
[edit]
Hello MicahR79. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "The Sater Design Collection".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Sater Design Collection}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC)