User talk:Mian Singh

May 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mansa, Punjab Assembly constituency. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 17:51, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello

I just want to tell you that when citing sources you need to add the page number otherwise your additions will be reverted. If you have any questions just ask. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 19:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Identifying reliable sources

Thank you for contributing to the article Shabeg Singh. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as self-published ones (nearly all websites, except those operated by newspapers or other traditional publishers), user-generated sources (group blogs, Wikipedia and other public wikis), and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. This is important because one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. The following are not reliable, and should not used as sources:

• allaboutsikhs.com (self-published)
• dbpedia.org (a mirror of Wikipedia)
• discoversikhism.com (self-published)
• punjabmonitor.com (self-published after 2011)
• saintsoldiers.net (user-generated content)
• sikhiwiki.org (user-generated content)

Identifying reliable sources (history) contains more specific advice for sourcing historical topics. Recent scholarship written by historians and published by academic presses is preferred; think history books and peer-reviewed journal articles. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Krishna into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:11, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sikhism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RegentsPark (comment) 16:53, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:11, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Undiscussed page moves

Please stop moving long-established pages to new titles without prior discussion, as you did for Krishna and List of battles involving the Sikh Empire recently. See WP:RM for the process to follow. Abecedare (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RegentsPark (comment) 16:54, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Literally two of my pages that I wrote were classified as wrong despite at least fifty to sixty edits. I highly doubt that it can be classified as a vandalism-only account. And even then I have been thanked by multiple accounts over my edits, most of the pages have been reviewed and have been checked without flaw.

Even, I am not sure if you have, read the page on Liquid Fire it is true and nothing was written "as a joke." Otherwise even the one on Krishna, I deleted and repasted it onto different pages as the Krishna in the four religions are all different Krishnas, and far more different than they seem at first sight. For example the one in Hinduism is a sage, part time warrior, vegetarian and non alcoholic while the Krishna in Sikhism is a full time warrior, non vegetarian, alcoholic and their stories vary alot. Mian Singh (talk) 15:23, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Liquid Fire

The article Liquid Fire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created by vandalism only account; references do not support the statements they are cited for; appears to be joke.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Happy days, ~ Lindsay^Hello 08:19, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mian Singh. Thank you for your work on Sarbat Khalsa (1986). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)