User talk:Miamelba

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Miamelba! Thank you for your contributions. I am Tom Morris and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! —Tom Morris (talk) 14:05, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Rosa Beddington, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Tom Morris (talk) 16:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ada Lovelace Day

		Ada Lovelace Award
		Hi Miamelba, Thank you for participating in the Ada Lovelace Day editathon! I'm presenting you with the Ada Lovelace Award for starting the Rosa Beddington, Rosalind Pitt-Rivers and Mary Edwards (human computer) articles. Your contributions are highly appreciated. Cheers, Gobōnobō ⁺ ^c 14:14, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mary Pickford (physiologist)

On 27 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mary Pickford (physiologist), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mary Pickford was the first woman appointed to a medical professorship at Edinburgh University? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Pickford (physiologist). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Rosalind Pitt-Rivers

Hello! Your submission of Rosalind Pitt-Rivers at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Muboshgu (talk) 15:31, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've updated with additional citations and removed an unverified statement someone added along the way. --Miamelba (talk) 16:11, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rosalind Pitt-Rivers

On 4 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rosalind Pitt-Rivers, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that biochemist Rosalind Pitt-Rivers co-discovered the thyroid hormone triiodothyronine in 1952? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rosalind Pitt-Rivers. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mary Parke

On 10 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mary Parke, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that phycologist Mary Parke first described the oyster larvae food Isochrysis galbana? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Parke. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:09, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Elanor Post Hutton

Hi Miamelba, I was just going through your recent article on Elanor Post Hutton, but I have been wondering as the article starts with "Elanor Post Close" what is the connection there? Could you elaborate where the Hutton/Close connection is, as I also don't see that she married a Hutton.

Anyway, many thanks for the work and contributions to the world of knowledge! Happy wiki-ing and kindest regards, (MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 07:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Hello! The surnames seem almost arbitrary at different points in her life, but that was taken from the article about her mother, Marjorie Merriweather Post and seems to have been her name at birth.

Cheers, Mia --Miamelba (talk) 10:24, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Miamelba! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel
Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering

Feel free to drop by our website, make a profile and see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 16:30, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sands Directory (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mr. Guye was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sands Directory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mr. Guye (talk) 03:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the sources I used are library web pages, and one is a published dictionary. The Sands Directories themselves are referenced in a number of Wikipedia articles [1] so this article was just designed to provide further context for those references. --Miamelba (talk) 11:54, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Miamelba, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mr. Guye (talk) 03:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no need to use Articles for Creation

Hi, Miamelba! I didn't see the twitter conversation until just now, but I just thought I'd let you know that you don't have to use Article for Creation to create new articles. New users are forced to use it (because new users are often rather naughty). But once you have a certain amount of Wikipedia experience (and you are well passed that threshold), you can create articles directly. This doesn't remove the obligation for sourcing etc, but does eliminate an unnecessary layer of process. Find an article that mentions your new topic, create a wikilink [[the new topic]] in that article -- it will be a redlink intially. Then click on the redlink and start creating your article. If I can be of any help, let me know. Kerry (talk) 07:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, you may still want to develop the draft article in your user space and then copy it over into your new article when it's sufficiently developed. Kerry (talk) 07:04, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kerry! For some reason I decided to follow the 'wizard'-type thing, but I've definitely learnt my lesson! --Miamelba (talk) 11:11, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contacting Editors from the Ada Lovelace Editathons

Hi Miamelba,

I hope you don’t mind me contacting you via your talk page. I’m a new Editor to Wikipedia, part of a small research team based at the University of Birmingham in the UK. I’m getting in touch as we’re trying to contact all the Editors who were involved in the Ada Lovelace Editathons in Oxford or London. If you have been, or still are, involved in editing, whatever the scale of your involvement, we would be very grateful for the opportunity to talk to you about your experiences. In the first instance, we’ve set up a short (10 minute) survey, which you can access via my User Talk Pages. If you are interested in helping with our research project, please can you drop me a line?

Thanks, RuthPage (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Towers Ward moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, John Towers Ward, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Behind the moors (talk) 18:37, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Towers Ward (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Towers Ward and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Towers Ward, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John Towers Ward

Hello, Miamelba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Towers Ward, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Towers Ward

Hello, Miamelba. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "John Towers Ward".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently I didn't see the first notice, and I wasn't able to retrieve the draft to update and improve the article, so now that work is lost. If someone is generally acting in good faith, six months isn't all that long, given all that's going on in the world... Miamelba (talk) 16:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mitchell's Press Directories

Hello, Miamelba,

Thank you for creating Mitchell's Press Directories.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for the new article. Please consider adding links to the article on relevant pages so that it is not orphaned.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Spicy}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Spicy (talk) 18:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]