User talk:Mi600740

Welcome!

Hello, Mi600740, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to List of James Bond films. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Betty Logan (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm CatcherStorm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of James Bond films has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CatcherStorm ^talk 20:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your addition of an infobox at List of James Bond films once again. You can see my explanation at Talk:List_of_James_Bond_films#Addition_of_the_infobox. Currently there is WP:NOCONSENSUS for an infobox should you discuss the matter at the talk page and obtain one before restoring it to the article. Also, I noticed you changed various figures in the article without providing a source. It is important that all data is sourced to be consistent with Wikipedia's WP:Verifiability policy. Betty Logan (talk) 08:04, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Bond 007 (Film Series) (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at James Bond filmography. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Bond 007 (Film Series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mi600740, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About my user page

Anyone who ever thinks about undoing or deleting any of the hard work and extensive research I had to do on my user page will have to reconsider. Because the page belongs to me, my personal property and please leave it alone and please stay away from it as warning, as caution. I don't want to face the past with I editing articles and people undoing them. So again, please pause, turn away and reconsider when encountering my user page, don't touch it. Thanks (Mi600740 (talk) 04:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC))[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of highest-grossing films, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 14:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Betty Logan, do you know why SchroCat retired? --Mi600740 (talk) 06:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically Draft:James Bond 007 (Film Series), may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. See WP:NFCC#9. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Decline Templates

Please do not remove AFC decline notice or AFC comments. It doesn't increase the likelihood of acceptance, but it makes the review process harder. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:09, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference formatting

Please be more careful when you update figures at List of highest-grossing films. In doing so you also altered the reference format. All references are formatted in the standard way in the article (i.e. author, title, year, edition/journal, publisher, isbn) to meet the requirements of the Featured List criteria. When you update figures on that list you only need to update the access date; it is not necessary—and often counter-productive—to alter other parts of the reference. Betty Logan (talk) 10:43, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darren Ramlogan

The article Darren Ramlogan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. BilCat (talk) 04:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:User pages, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 06:30, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of highest-grossing films. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:44, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of James Bond films

I have nominated List of James Bond films for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. The Transhumanist 14:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 11:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me, Fortuna, how were my 2 last messages considered harassment? I was simply trying to convey a point and Wikipedia is deemed to be untrustworthy by several schoolteachers since anyone can edit on here. Please answer my questions instead of simply blocking me. Also, I wasn't trying to harass anyone. And yes, I want Wikipedia's policies to become more lenient, especially towards fans.

Thank You.

--Mi600740 (talk) 06:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since you really want it spelling out... [1]. Personally, I'd let it go, and hope others do too. Happy editing! O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 09:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just please answer my questions. I was trying to convey a point, not harras anyone. That isn't a proper answer to my questions. Please give me a more valid answer.

--Mi600740 (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also please answer this, do you even know Wikipedia is an untrustworthy site because teachers and other educators might the think the same since schools are taught not to use Wikipedia as a source for any research that they do for school or college or even a university. And, no I am not letting go of any of my arguments. If I really want to, I can give you an overwhelming amount of proof of my arguments. Please don't tell me that I should on quote "drop the stick" and don't block me.

Thanks Mi600740 (talk) 20:41, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please fix your signature so it complies with WP:SIGLINK. Thanks. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Having Trouble

Hello NeilN ^{talk to me}, I took a look at the article on how to fix my signature, but apparently, whatever method I used, the signature never appeared to be correct, please help me. Oh, never mind I knew what it was, how silly of me, I checked on a box in my user profile setting under user signature which comprimised with my desired signature whenever on talk pages.

--Mi600740 (talk) 06:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second rate rubbish

I suggest you read WP:FAKEARTICLE. Your page is second-rate rubbish, full of errors and badly written. – SchroCat (talk) 00:30, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

Your recent editing history at User talk:SchroCat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – SchroCat (talk) 00:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On the last edit there SchoCat, I was trying to compromise with you by removing most of the content which made the user page look like a poor article. Ever since I have used Wikia Fandom I felt like I didn't need for the content to be here, but instead have it on the Fandom so I wouldn't need to have the article here. I could have it somewhere else. i could also see why the article was poorly written because everything was so inconsistent. I mean the way the villains and the cars were put together in that hideous timeline was appalling to me so I had merged some of the data onto an existing Fandom article so I would appear much cleaner and with more adequate grammar. See I have changed since I have last contacted you. (Mi600740 (talk) 00:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Also, SchroCat, please see to my unfinished Draft of the next Bond film and tell me how it looks so far. Please. Do it please. Don't delete this message I'm begging you and I apologise profusely for my reckless actions. Draft:Bond 25 (Mi600740 (talk) 00:55, 5 July 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alerts for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics and articles and content relating to recently deceased or living peopl

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:06, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You and farewell

For the few years struggling to have my contributions validated have been a intresting journey for me for I shall retire from Wikipedia as a user. I don't care to make anymore edits on articles as Wikipedia continues to push liberal bias. I don't edit here often anymore anyway. I have better things to do. I always didn't like here anyway.

Farewell (Mi600740 (talk) 18:47, 14 February 2019 (UTC))[reply]

June 12, 2019 edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual 2019" in Vancouver British Columbia

1000 Women in Religion: A Wikipedia edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual 2019" in Vancouver, British Columbia

The 1000 Women in Religion Project is working to improve the coverage of women’s contributions to religious, spiritual and wisdom traditions worldwide. In support of this goal, the edit-a-thon at Atla's (formerly the American Theological Library Association) annual meeting will focus on improving articles about women in religion. We would love to have a few Vancouver area Wikipedians to help us get new editors oriented and editing!!

Wednesday, June 12, 2019
8:00am-12:00pm
Sheraton Vancouver Wall Centre
1088 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 2R9 Canada

For more details or to sign up, see: Wikipedia edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual Meeting" in Vancouver, British Columbia. For security reasons everyone attending the edit-a-thon must pre-register with Atla here or on our Vancouver Meetup page by May 31st.
For questions, please contact: Dzingle1

Dzingle1 (talk) 02:39, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Dzingle1 (talk) 21:52, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]