User talk:Mhmllr

Conflict of interest

Hello, Mhmllr. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Thomas Sanchez (writer), you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:31, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OrangeMike

You deleted 16 hours of well-intended work done in good faith, intended to address the issues presented in the banner at the top, and the issues you raise in your communication to me.

Comparing the entry with those of other contemporary writers, I see absolutely no justification for the wholesale deletion of my content.

I am not at all “biased” in favor of the subject. You will note that I have been working to eliminate the tone of self-promotion and simply give the reader an overview of the author’s work and life.

Please allow me to do this.

Mark Miller (mhmllr) Los Angeles

You have admitted you're working on the article on Sanchez' behalf. If you're going to make it impartial, you need to get rid of all the breathless publisher's-blurb purple prose like "explores a chaotic and dangerous world of barrio gangs, anti-Communist hysteria, religious cults, and undercover government agents". You don't see blather like that in the articles on writers like Octavia Butler or Samuel R. Delany. (Boring is good; think Encyclopedia Brittanica, not Publisher's Weekly pull quote.) We also need properly formatted citations; see WP:CITE. I like Sanchez' work; that's why I went back to try to salvage as much as possible; and I'll be glad to work with you on that. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:59, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Thomas Sanchez (writer) does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! ukexpat (talk) 20:44, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The content you added back is either not backed by the sources provided, or "sourced" to fan blogs and the like. Please, take it slowly and explain your edits, including using the edit summary feature. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:58, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]