User talk:Mhbucklin

May 2018

Hello, I'm Deli nk. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. [1] Deli nk (talk) 14:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ariana Rockefeller has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ariana Rockefeller. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 14:22, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ariana Rockefeller (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ariana Rockefeller and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ariana Rockefeller, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv🍁 15:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mhbucklin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bradv🍁 15:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I saw that an article you created, Ariana Rockefeller has not been added to any categories. According to the guideline Wikipedia:Categorization, every article should be in at least one category. Please help by adding categories to the articles you create. You can take a look at the categorization FAQ. If you need further help, ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jax 0677 . Thank you. I will add a category now.

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 08:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mhbucklin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi. I apologize that this took some time to respond to this block. I believe that there is some misunderstanding. I helped my wife Ariana Rockefeller in the creation of her Wikipedia page, because she is from a well known family, the great great grand daughter of John D. Rockefeller. Ariana is in the media frequently, and talked about regularly online, and sometimes facts about her are misrepresented about her. The intention of creating the Wikipedia page was to help provide all of the true facts about her life. It is not the intention to advertise or promote Ariana in anyway, just put out the definitive facts about her, as is the purpose of Wikipedia. I hope that the editors can understand this and will remove the block. Please let me know if further clarification is required. Thank you. Mhbucklin (talk) 20:21, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please review the conflict of interest policy which will explain why it is problematic for you to directly edit about your wife. You are actually incorrect about the purpose of Wikipedia; the purpose of Wikipedia is to collect human knowledge about subjects that meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability as described in independent reliable sources. If you just want to tell the world what you consider "true facts" about someone, you should use social media or a personal website. If there is incorrect information on Wikipedia about your wife, we want to know what it is, but according to Wikipedia guidelines and practices, such as through using edit requests. You won't be unblocked to just edit about your wife; if you want to be a general Wikipedia contributor, please tell what other subjects you want to edit about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 21:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mhbucklin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When I created the page I did disclose that it was of someone I was related to, as I knew I needed to. It is clearly an very notable person, with many references in highly reputable media sources, and the article is written very objectively. All of that would seem difficult to argue with. I hope you will reconsider. Mhbucklin (talk) 19:57, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for advertising. Whether or not you disclosed that you were violating our policies isn't relevant to the fact that you were violating our policies. The disclosure exists to make it easier to identify when people are violating them. I am declining this unblock request because you are not addressing the reason for your block at all, but are instead trying to distract from the core issue that you are using Wikipedia as a means to promote a person, which is not allowed even if you tell us you are doing that. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:18, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have gone through all your edits since December 2018 to find that supposed disclosure, to no avail. Could you please point out where, exactly, you made that disclosure? Huon (talk) 21:33, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) Thanks for consideration. I believe the article was written very objectively, never intended to be promotional. Some information needs to be clarified. I don't know why, but someone keeps changing the birthday to the 28th. It would be nice if you would please consider unblocking me. I understand the purpose and policies of Wikipedia and never tried to violate them. Thanks.

Initially I submitted the page for review and I believe I made the disclosure then. The response I got from the reviewer did not indicate that that was the issue. Thanks for looking. Mhbucklin (talk) 15:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only one open request is needed, additional comment should be unformatted standard comments. 331dot (talk) 15:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]