User talk:Mghostsoft

Proposed deletion of Integral expression

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Integral expression, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Bkell (talk) 11:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mghostsoft. I can't remember "integral expression" being used in that way, even though my specialization is numerical analysis, which you thought to be a good category for the article. Could you please add a reference to ease my concerns? Thanks. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 13:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions. Since the article has been recoveried, I improved it by adding some details. I saw this concept in a Chinese textbook for Senior 1 students(photocopy here), but nowhere else. This way to saying this concept is rarely, but that textbook is the most commonly used bysenior schools in China mainland. And the translation givin by that textbook is "integral expression"([1], see the row of which the third column is "59"). I guess this concept is created in case in some definitions, monomials are not a kind of polynomials. Thanks! -- Mghostsoft (talk) 14:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Integral expression

In case you haven't already seen it, you might want to read the discussion at Talk:Integral expression. The article's claim that "integral expression" is a synonym for "polynomial" has not been backed up by reliable sources - the link given to a Chinese text book can hardly substantiate a claim about how the term is normally used in English. The current proposal is to replace the article's text with a dismabiguation page which will briefly describe the two alternative meanings that have been found for this term - this will be done in the next day or so. If you wish to keep a copy of the article's present text, you can of course copy it to a sub-page of your user page. Gandalf61 (talk) 08:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Join Network Studio of NENU"

A page you created, Join Network Studio of NENU, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. – Jerry^teps 06:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for concerning about this term, but this term is being edited and is developed a small part. I will let it perfected in a few hours.MGhostSoft 06:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: iPod touch

We might need to get consensus regarding this, but as Apple's own website points to the 8GB being the second-gen model updated with 3.1 while the 32 and 64 GB models are "new"; blogs tend to refer to the 32 and 64 as a new generation. Because of Apple's own inconsistency with nomenclature, most Apple naming schemes used here have been based on what the internet, and not what Apple says. Butterfly0fdoom (talk) 19:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Main page of dsjyw.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Main page of dsjyw.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]